Jun 29, 2009

Korach 5769/2009: "Korach's Children"

Korach 5769/2009: "Korach's Children"
Rabbi Menachem Creditor

Celebrating the 50th wedding anniversary of Sheila and Art Braufman
Celebrating the the marriage of Eliyahu Sills and Rachel Valfer

The story of Korach might not seem obvious for discussing relationships.  After all, Korach and his followers, after contesting the rights of Moses and Aaron to lead the Israelite people, were devoured when "the ground under them burst asunder, and the earth opened its mouth and swallowed them up with their households. ...They went down alive into Sheol, with all that belonged to them; the earth closed over them and they vanished from the midst of the congregation. (Num. 16:31-33)"  Not what we pray for in healthy relationships, to say the least.

And yet there is a message to be learned, perhaps in contrast with the Torah's narrative.

What was Korach's crime?  What was so awful that it merited this devastating a response?  Korach, a cousin Moses and Aaron, rose up "against Moses, together with two hundred and fifty Israelites, chieftains of the community, chosen in the assembly, men of repute. They combined against Moses and Aaron and said to them, 'You have gone too far! For all the community are holy, all of them, and the Lord is in their midst. Why then do you raise yourselves above the Lord's congregation?' (Num. 16:2-3)"

The accusation, while certainly rebellious, is quite compelling.  Korach's assertions that "all the community are holy" and that God "is in their midst" don't seem wrong.  In fact, they are confirmed by other similar biblical phrases, such as "Let them make for Me a Sanctuary, that I may dwell in their midst. (Ex. 25:8)" and "Speak to the entire assembly of Israel and say to them: 'Be holy because I, Adonai your God, am Holy. (Lev. 19:2)"  There is deep truth in Korach's words, a truth which resonates for the community.  We must remember that he managed to rouse more than 250 Israelites against Moses, who has, time and time again, been the agent of God's Word and stood in the breach, protecting the people from God's Wrath.

Korach's charismatic ability led people against Moses.  But what would have happened if Korach had channeled his righteous indignation and magnetic personality in the service of the People, offering Moses his help instead of trying to assert his own leadership?  Korach could have become a revered teammate to Moses by offered his help, instead of questioning the authenticity of Moses' authority.

And this suggests, perhaps, a lesson for couples, and for those in potentially collaborative leadership roles.  Korach wanted a job Moses didn't even want for himself, one which Moses' reluctance made him supremely qualified to perform and for which Korach's over-willingness made him especially unsuited.  Think of what these two strong personalities, these two different people, could have achieved had they been in partnership for the sake of the people!

Korach and his followers experienced a descent when the earth swallow them.  But somehow, according to biblical tradition (Num. 26:9), Korach's children don't die.  Their descendants are later, in fact, credited with several chapters of Psalms, all of which reflect musically upon the enduring possibilities and values of life (see Ps. 49, for instance).  As Rabbi Perry Netter has written, "Korach is the symbol of rebellion and conflict and despair; his sons are a symbol of hope."

While every relationship comprised of two people with strong personalities has its share of struggle, the possibilities created by the actualization of sacred relationship is hopeful beyond words, perhaps most through the songs of their children.

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Jun 27, 2009

LETTER FROM THE EAST BAY COUNCIL OF RABBIS TO THE BERKELEY DAILY PLANET

LETTER FROM THE EAST BAY COUNCIL OF RABBIS TO THE BERKELEY DAILY PLANET
http://www.berkeleydaily.org/issue/2009-06-25/article/33213?headline=Readers-Respond-to-The-Campaign-Against-the-Daily-Planet

Editors, Daily Planet:

We, the 40 East Bay rabbis who are members of the East Bay Council of Rabbis and serve the local Jewish community, support freedom of the press. We also support good journalism. We believe that coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict should be fair and honest. The Daily Planet has a right to publish its views and the views of its readers. Those who disagree have the same right. Those who have voiced their opposition to the Daily Planet's coverage are entitled to speak and be heard. It is not accurate to label everyone who has disagreed with positions expressed in the Planet as militant right-wingers. Critics of views expressed in the Daily Planet come from a number of political perspectives. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is complex, and as rabbis who come from a variety of perspectives, we encourage people to explore many sources in learning about this important issue.

The overwhelming majority of the members of the Jewish community of the East Bay, the people we serve and represent, and of the citizens of the United States, support both Israel and the peace process. Many in the Jewish community have been vocal opponents of some Israeli government policies and are part of the community's dialogue. The Jewish community does not censor criticism of Israel and neither its leadership nor its designated representatives are engaged in a campaign against the Daily Planet. We decry any efforts by anyone who would stifle the flow of information.

At times criticism of Israeli government policies and actions has crossed over into classically anti-Semitic expression when it targets Jewishness itself as a blameworthy status—as did the Kurosh Arianpour commentary the Daily Planet printed some years back. Disseminating hate speech against any ethnic or religious group, while it may be constitutionally legal, is not acceptable when allowed to stand on its own in a community paper and given the appearance of reasonable discourse. Hate speech against any group is unacceptable; in the same vein we would expect that the Planet would refrain from printing racist or homophobic material. The claim of freedom of the press does not excuse journalists from meeting the standards of civil discourse.

Rabbi Andrea Berlin

On behalf of the East Bay Council of Rabbis

Jun 26, 2009

jewish week: "Choose Life, Not Kiddush Clubs"

NY Jewish Week: Choose Life, Not Kiddush Clubs
by Philip Lanzkowsky, Howard Trachtman And Irving Zoltan
Published on: Jun 17, 2009

It is now widely acknowledged, after years of denial, that alcoholism is increasingly prevalent in the Jewish community. In suburban Baltimore, two centers are already dedicated to the treatment of recovering Jewish drug addicts and alcoholics. It is estimated that approximately 10 percent of Jewish men have problems with excessive alcohol intake and dependence. Although this figure is less than other religious groups where the incidence may reach 30 percent, the number is still unacceptably high. 

The extent of the problem among Orthodox versus less observant Jews is open to debate but many professionals have expressed concern that the Orthodox lifestyle may provide opportunities for alcohol abuse and that religious practices may provide justification for and mask excessive alcohol ingestion.  The most disturbing fact is that young Jews seem to be more vulnerable to alcohol abuse than their parents. This is reason enough for Jewish parents to set a good example and avoid behaviors that promote inappropriate alcohol consumption.

As pediatricians, we are troubled by the prevalence of Kiddush Clubs in Orthodox shuls and the availability of hard liquor for the congregation at Kiddush after services. The habit of having a drink during prayer services arose in the small shtetls of Europe before the full impact and adverse effects of alcohol on health were appreciated. We think that the practice of drinking hard alcohol on shul premises promotes and sanctions behavior that can have deleterious effects on younger members of the community. 

Regular meetings of Kiddush Clubs provide an implicit sanction for a form of covert drinking. It provides a veneer of respectability and exclusivity, suggesting a "coolness" about those individuals who are part of this private, select drinking group. These adults become the enablers of youth drinking. This is well described by Rabbi Dr. Tzvi Hersh Weinreb, executive vice president of the Orthodox Union: "It's not only drinking, it's idealized drinking which is a very, very bad message for the kids." 

What validation and sanction for this behavior does a child or adolescent need more than "I saw it in shul?" The Orthodox Union voted in 2005 to recommend that affiliated synagogues end Kiddush Clubs. Although many congregations objected that this was an excessive response to isolated incidents of alcohol abuse, other enlightened shuls have curtailed their Kiddush Clubs. Other denominations, such as Reform temples, have never established this practice.

There are numerous publications in the pediatric literature detailing the adverse effects of alcohol exposure on susceptible children and adolescents. An extreme example of the physical danger of alcohol is illustrated in a recent article in Newsweek by Lisa Miller that describes a young "orthodox" man who became so drunk on Shabbat that he drove his car into the oncoming traffic lane, rolled his car and crashed into a cottage. It is our contention that there are vulnerable children in our communities whose latent propensity to excessive alcohol intake may be triggered by Kiddush Clubs and the drinking of hard liquor on shul premises. 

Pediatricians have advocated for bans on smoking and fought against advertising campaigns directed at adolescents. These efforts have achieved a substantial reduction in smoking among young people. They have convinced pediatricians that they can change unhealthy practices and combat long-standing, condoned behaviors. As pediatricians and members of Orthodox shuls, we believe that banning Kiddush Clubs would help protect vulnerable children and adolescents.

In discussing this matter with local synagogue leadership, the common justification for continuing the practice of drinking in shul is that there have been no adverse consequences in their particular locale. In addition, they feel that it is a custom that they cannot easily challenge because it is too deeply rooted and the participants are frequently senior and otherwise respected congregants. Drinking hard liquor in shul is a prevalent practice that has ardent followers but serves no constructive purpose in Jewish communal life.

We do not want to address issues regarding the impact of Kiddush Clubs on decorum in synagogues, the inappropriateness of interrupting services, or disrespect for prayer engendered by participation in Kiddush Clubs. We do not even touch upon the potential liability that synagogues may face through property or personal damages to congregants or others that might occur following alcohol ingestion on shul premises.

A laissez-faire attitude towards Kiddush Clubs in general, an inexplicable timidity in confronting club members, and a misguided attempt to minimize the problem by asserting the involvement of only a small group of outliers are all unacceptable strategies. They evade parental and congregational responsibility to ensure that children are not exposed to unhealthy habits especially within the confines of the synagogue. Kiddush Clubs are a phenomenon unique to Orthodox Jews. Rather than choosing to hide behind the banner of tradition, we encourage confronting this potential health problem in a straightforward manner. 

In an effort to foster the protection of the younger members of the Jewish community from the potential development of abnormal drinking behavior as adults, we strongly urge that the drinking of alcohol (other than Kiddush wine) be prohibited on the synagogue premises. We call upon like-minded medical professionals and other individuals to assert their influence in their communities to once and for all put an end to social practices that foster abnormal consumption of alcohol in shuls.

Philip Lanzkowsky and Howard Trachtman are professors of pediatrics at the Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, and Irving Zoltan is assistant clinical professor of pediatrics at Einstein.

 

Jun 24, 2009

written by a proud member of Netivot Shalom, shared by her proud rabbi!

Catholic to Kugel

With an African-American Christian mom and a Jewish dad, Michella didn't know where she stood--until she found that conversion was her answer.

June 10, 2009

http://www.interfaithfamily.com/relationships/growing_up_in_an_interfaith_family/Catholic_to_Kugel.shtml

This article originally appeared in the May/June 2009 issue of JVibe, the magazine for Jewish teens. Reprinted by permission.

I had always thought about going to synagogue. But it wasn't until a year-and-a-half ago that I stepped foot in one for the first time. I was 12. Congregation Netivot Shalom in Berkeley, Calif., was warm and spacious--not like the cold pews I was used to sitting in during services. That night I stayed for the Shabbat service, and when it ended, my dad introduced me to the congregation. We joined them for Kiddush, and met some of the kids.

Being in a new environment was a scary thing. Everyone had obviously known one another for a long time, and I was just meeting them for the first time. I was shy about starting new chapter in my life, but I decided that I would come back and give it a try.

Michella Ore and friends

Michella Ore (far L) and friends.

You see, I'm Catholic. My mom is an African-American Christian, and my dad is a mixture of Nigerian, Native American, Russian and German--and is Jewish by birthright. After years of attending a Catholic school, I realized that Judaism allowed me to question things in ways that Catholicism did not. Judaism offered me the opportunity to learn from the Scripture but also to question it. During my elementary years in Catholic school, I had always questioned whether Jesus was the son of God. I felt that we are children of God and that no one person should be singled out as more God-given than the rest.

Learn Fast

After more than a year, I still learn new things at synagogue every week. When I'm not able to go to services, I read the weekly Torah portion. I have also been attending a bat mitzvah prep class on Sundays in which we discuss Jewish women and their influences on the Torah.

In the beginning of my process of conversion, I had to learn how to read Hebrew. It was tough at first, but not being able to sing along in services was motivation to learn. I got help from a friend at Netivot Shalom, who taught me the basics. I also studied on my own, and now I can keep up with services and sing the psalms and prayers myself. But the most difficult thing has been studying religious texts and balancing my regular schoolwork. Add to that my extracurriculars and social life, and you have a pretty busy 14-year-old!

There were times when I was frustrated with Hebrew and days of religious observance when I had to decide whether to go to school or to synagogue. When I decided to go to school, I was questioned about what's more important. I have since learned that religion and education are equally important, and I need to find a balance so I can get what I need from both.

Faking It

The process has not been smooth sailing. People have sometimes called me a "fake Jew." Because of my mixed heritage, I've been told I don't look Jewish--I've even been questioned about how I could possibly be Jewish. To me, stating that I'm a Jew should be enough information. I believe there's no such thing as a fake Jew. The term is usually directed toward converts and those whose mothers aren't Jewish, but I feel as much of a Jew as anyone. If you are a Jew at heart, you're Jewish--period. As future generations are born, fewer Jews will still look like the "stereotypical" Jew.

Converting is important to me because I want to officially be confirmed as a Jew. I want to be acknowledged throughout the world as a Jew, without a doubt from anyone. Converting will state on paper what I have felt all along. Being Jewish is more than a religion to me; it's a way of life. People say that being Jewish is just a religion, but it's more than that. I know atheistic Jews who don't believe in God but still consider themselves Jews. I have learned that Jews don't just read the Torah, they live by it. And this is one of the reasons I was drawn closer to the religion and the culture.

It's My Life

I hope the conversion process teaches me what it means to be a Jew, including the many devastating events Jews have experienced so I can share that pain and support with those who need help. I want to have a Jewish household when I grow up and pass along the teachings to my children. Along the way, I may even gain a thicker skin--after hearing that I don't "look" Jewish, I hope to learn how to ignore negative comments and instead focus on my goals.

In January, I flew to Boston (my first time on an airplane!) for an event run by The Curriculum Initiative (TCI)--a Jewish educational organization serving independent high schools. I was uneasy about the people I was going to meet during the weekend. From what little I had heard, East Coast Jews aren't that tolerant of "diverse" Jews. So when I arrived and saw that the event was being led by an African-American Jew, I was pleasantly surprised. While I was in Boston, I met many types of Jews from different ethnicities who had diverse views on politics. The trip stripped me of my ignorance and reinforced my decision to convert.

Throughout this intense process I have learned that we must follow what we know is best for ourselves, even if other people don't see it that way. I haven't had everyone's support, but I know it's the right answer for me.

Michella Ore lives in Berkeley, Calif., and attends private school in the Bay Area. She enjoys music and art and is really proud of her latest black-and-white print. In the future she wants to become a scientist and reside in a villa with her loved ones.
---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

AP news story for Parashat Korach: "Dead Sea peril: sinkholes swallow up the unwary"

Dead Sea peril: sinkholes swallow up the unwary

In this photo taken Thursday, May 28, 2009, a woman covered in mineral mudAP – In this photo taken Thursday, May 28, 2009, a woman covered in mineral mud stands by the Dead Sea. Geologist …

EIN GEDI, Israel – Eli Raz was peering into a narrow hole in the Dead Sea shore when the earth opened up and swallowed him. Fearing he would never be found alive in the 30-foot- deep pit, he scribbled his will on an old postcard.

After 14 hours a search party pulled him from the hole unhurt, and five years later the 69-year-old geologist is working to save others from a similar fate, leading an effort to map the sinkholes that are spreading on the banks of the fabled saltwater lake.

These underground craters can open up in an instant, sucking in whatever lies above and leaving the surrounding area looking like an earthquake zone.

The phenomenon, Raz said, stems from a dire water shortage, compounded in recent years by tourism and chemical industries as well as a growing population. "This is the most remarkable evidence of the brutal interference of humans in the Dead Sea," he said.

The parched moonscape, famous as the site of biblical Sodom and Gomorra, is the lowest point on earth and runs more than 60 miles through Israel and the West Bank.

Large sections of the coast are fenced off and signposted in Hebrew and English: "danger, open pits" and "sinkhole area ahead." But it's too expensive to inspect every place for danger. Just two months ago an Israeli hiker wandered into an area that had no warning signs and was critically injured when he fell into a sinkhole.

While such accidents are rare, Raz says there are up to 3,000 open sinkholes along the coast and likely just as many that haven't burst open yet. And they're having a big impact on Israeli development plans.

The collapsing terrain has forced authorities to close a campground, date groves and a small naval base, and to scrap plans for 5,000 new hotel rooms, said Galit Cohen, director of environmental planning at the Ministry of the Environment.

The holes, also found on the Jordanian side of the sea, are the result of the Dead Sea having shrunk by a third since the 1960s when Israel and Jordan built plants to divert water flowing through its main tributary, theJordan River.

The holes form when a subterranean salt layer that once bordered the sea is dissolved by underground fresh water that follows the receding Dead Sea waters.

The main road along the shore has been torn apart by streams whose energy is increased because they are flowing farther to reach the receding sea, and all construction along the strip between sea and highway is banned, Cohen said.

Both Israel and Jordan evaporate Dead Sea water to extract its phosphates and have built hotels along the coasts for the thousands of tourists who come in search of the curative powers of Dead Sea mud, or simply for the experience of floating unsinkably in its salt-saturated waters.

Only micro-organisms survive in the Dead Sea, but indigenous species of fish, amphibians and snails live in small nearby ponds fed by underground springs, and these could be wiped out as the Dead Sea gets smaller, Raz said.

Many of the changes are masked at the pricey resorts on the sea's southern end, which lie on the banks of a large artificial pond built by the mineral industry. But around Ein Gedi, the kibbutz or communal farm where Raz lives, the Dead Sea's shrinkage is evident.

Twenty-five years ago Ein Gedi built a spa by the sea. Now it's a one-mile trolley ride from the water.

"Any visitor that's come back for a second visit in these last 10 years would see a dramatic change," said Gidon Bromberg, Israel director of Friends of the Earth Middle East, an advocacy group. "The sea has run away from the cliffs and it's exposed kilometers of mud and sea floor."

No quick solution is in sight.

The World Bank is studying a proposal to dig a canal from the Red Sea, more than 100 miles south, to replenish the Dead Sea's waters. But with costs estimated at up to $15 billion, there's little optimism it will happen.

Without a solution, the sea is expected to shrink to lose another third of its area over the next century.

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Jun 23, 2009

Dan Schifrin: "The Lovely Bones"

Dan Schifrin: "The Lovely Bones"
The New York Jewish Week

The marrow of life: Jon Galinson, with his family, needs a stem cell transplant.
The marrow of life: Jon Galinson, with his family, needs a stem cell transplant.

by Daniel Schifrin
Special To The Jewish Week

"Transmissions flow from your heart to Mine, trading, twining my pain with yours. Am I not — you? Are you not — I?"
— Abraham Joshua Heschel, "I and you."

There are moments when the idea of Jews being "one" transcends the clichés of both community and continuity.

When my friend Jon Galinson was diagnosed with a rare blood cancer, requiring a stem cell transplant, it was likely that his match would be another Jew of Ashkenazic descent. Our community in Northern Californi
a, where the Galinsons live, sprang into action.

At our synagogue, Berkeley's Congregation Netivot Shalom, a drive to register 100 new donors for Be The Match, the national bone marrow registry, delivered almost three times that. And at the annual Israel in the Gardens festival, the community's largest public Jewish event, the booth set up by Jon's friends and family seemed to exert a gravitational pull on the proceedings, as people crowded around to learn more about Jon, as well as the medical procedure that could save his life.

Since I am incapable of entering into a communal experience without analyzing the language and narrative that underlie it, I started exploring the physical and spiritual symbolism of a donor offering a sample of his or her bone marrow to a stranger, and I was shocked to see how the spiritual, physiological, communal and literary converged.

Figurative language, as we often forget in our urban and technological world, usually reflects our primal experience in the natural world. We talk about feeling something "in our bones"; an interest in art, or in music, being "in our blood." 

The Bible is full of this. In the second story of the creation of Eve, Adam muses on her formation from his rib, describing her as being "Bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh." The liturgist Marcia Folk, in "The Book of Blessings," quotes Isaiah in a new Rosh Chodesh prayer over wine: "It shall come to be from one month to the next/that your hearts will rejoice/and your bones will flower like young grass."

Moses, before he can deliver the Israelites, must find the bones of Joseph to return to the Holy Land. In "The Jewish Book of Days," Jill Hammer offers this interpretation: "Throughout the 40 years of wandering, the bones whisper to the Israelites of their distant past and their still-unimagined future. Then the bones are planted in the land as if they were seeds, to bring new life to the people as they build anew home."

Then, of course, there is the prophesy of Ezekiel, whose vision of communal revival in the valley of dry bones is among the most moving in our tradition.  
What is striking to me about this language is that bones evoke not skeletons, or our calcified remains after death, but the opposite — life, creativity, possibility. In a way this supports our medical knowledge about bone marrow, which, in the large bones of adults, produces new blood cells.

Not only that, but to echo the spiritual undertones in Heschel's poem above, the fact that one person's bones could give life to another is suggestive of the divine spirit that flows through all of us.

Finally — giving God the last word — Ezekiel is told that "these bones are the whole house of Israel." In my interpretation, this "house of Israel" is the community of people who are animated by the attempt to keep the divine spark alive, moving as one toward a higher purpose that occasional comes into sharp relief. 

All this comes full circle, not just to Jon Galinson but also to today's House of Israel. For the life that might be saved by a donor match is not just Jon's, but the community's as a whole. Ezekiel's vision of a "lifeless" community, for a contemporary audience, might translate into a Judaism that is inert, passive and without agency. By engaging in a mitzvah like registering to possibly save a life, a community finds itself — as the dry bones did — back on its feet: "I will put My breath into you, and you shall live again." 

Note: To register as a (potential) donor, one must be between 18 and 60, and in good health. The process requires a simple cheek swab. Promo code JonGalinson reduces the cost of online registration at www.BeTheMatch.com to $25. 

Daniel Schifrin is writer in residence and director of public programs at the Contemporary Jewish Museum in San Francisco.

G'vanim: Denominations

Dear Chevreh,

The newest issue of G'vanim: The Journal of The Academy for Jewish Religion, was just posted online, and I have pasted below the table of contents and a note from the editor, our colleague, Rabbi David Greenstein (full disclosure: I was honored to be one of the contributors).  The conversation, which centers around the notion (and question) of Denominationalism is provocative, and worth pursuing, I believe.

Kol Tuv,
Menachem

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org 

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.


G'vanim: The Journal of The Academy for Jewish Religion
Volume 5, Number 1
http://www.ajrsem.org/index.php?id=461

A WORD FROM THE EDITOR

This issue of the Journal is divided into two parts, each of which includes essays of new ideas and insights. In the first part, David Greenstein shares with us his thoughts on reexamining Jewish marriage with an emphasis on equality of the sexes. Ellis Rivkin, who predicted the dissolution of the Soviet Union long before it happened, affirms the authenticity of all previous forms of Judaism and how it impacts on today's Judaism. I look into the two different views of lighting the Sabbath candles. The second part of our Journal is devoted to a symposium on the future of the different branches of Judaism. Herein lies a great difficulty – a problem of sorts. Kol hathaloth qashot (all beginnings are difficult). Although we invited Rabbis from the different branches of Judaism – Orthodox, Conservative, Reform, Reconstructionist and Renewal – to participate, you will note the absence of certain of those voices. Our questionnaire contained the following:
  1. Do you currently identify with a particular denomination or movement? If so, which one?
  2. What do you think are the positives and/or negatives of identification with a movement?
  3. How would you describe the future of the current movements?
  4. What challenges or changes do you foresee?
  5. What are the realities and what are the possibilities of interactions among the different Jewish branches currently? In the future?
  6. What are and what will be the effects of pluralistic developments?
  7. Do you think new movements will develop?
  8. Is the denominational structure of North American Jewry meaningful abroad—in Israel or in other communities?
It is interesting to see the responses of Menachem Creditor (Conservative), Leonard Kravitz (Reform), Noam Marans (Conservative), Stephen Pearce (Reform), Robert Seltzer (Reform), Rav Soloff (Reform), Gilbert Rosenthal (Conservative), and Martin Rozenberg (Reform). The essays are brilliant, insightful and provide ample food for thought. Jerome Chanes (Orthodox) was kind enough, in a most skillful way, to respond to the essays. Now it is for us, as Hillel put it, to go and study.

Editorial Board

A R T I C L E S

Equality and Sanctity: Rethinking Jewish Marriage in Theory and in Ceremony
David Greenstein
Read article (PDF)

Lessons From the Past: Mutation As a Mode of Jewish Survivals
Ellis Rivkin
Read article (PDF)

How Are the Sabbath Candles to Be Lit?
Bernard Zlotowitz
Read article (PDF)

S Y M P O S I U M: The Future of the Different Movements in Judaism

Participants: Conservative Judaism and Denominationalism
Menachem Creditor
Read article (PDF)

Reform Means Change
Leonard Kravitz
Read article (PDF)

Denominationalism and Its Discontents
Noam E. Marans
Read article (PDF)

Denominations in a Pluralistic World - Where We Are Headed
Stephen S. Pearce
Read article (PDF)

Prophecy and Predictions
Gilbert S. Rosenthal
Read article (PDF)

The Realistic Challenges Confronting the Liberal Jew
Martin Rozenberg
Read article (PDF)

Toward a Post-Ideological, and Therefore a Post-Denominational Liberal Judaism?
Robert M. Seltzer
Read article (PDF)

The Fifth Mutation
Rav Soloff
Read article (PDF)

S Y M P O S I U M     R E S P O N S E
Denomination, Post-Denomination, Trans-Denomination: Whither, Indeed, American Jewish Movements?
Jerome Chanes
Read article (PDF)


BOOK REVIEWS:

Norman E. Tutorow: The Autobiography of Jesus: As Told to the Centurion Cornelius Nepos IV, A Tale of Everyman,
Reviewed by Martin S. Rozenberg

Bernard Avishai: The Hebrew Republic: How Secular Democracy and Global Enterprise Will Bring Israel Peace at Last,
Reviewed by Paul Kushner

Edward Kritzler: Jewish Pirates of the Caribbean
Reviewed by Harry A. Ezratty

Read book reviews (PDF)

Contributors



a recommended Summer book list

Shalom Chevreh - 


I thought you might be interested in this for some summer reading suggestions.  The coordinator of a Jewish Mindfulness class I've taught in Marin County was sweet enough to collect all the books and a few articles I've recommended over the past year, and organize them into a list.  Enjoy!  


Kol Tuv,

Rabbi Creditor


·        If This Is A Man by Primo Levi (also known as "Survival in Auschwitz")

·        Touchpoints by T. Berry Brazelton

·        New Reform Prayer Book called Mishkan T'filah, by CCAR Press, http://ccarpress.org/mishkan/

·        G-d at 2000 by Marcus Borg

·        When Bad Things Happen To Good People by Harold Kushner

·        Dying Well by Dr. Ira Byock

·        The Jewish Way in Death and Mourning by Maurice Lamm

·        The Death of Death by Rabbi Neil Gillman

·        Does the Soul Survive by Elie Kaplan

·        Should We Burn Babar? by Herbert Kohl

·        Pete Seeger's Storytelling Book by Pete Seeger

·        The Next Place by Warren Hanson

·        The Sabbath by Abraham Joshua Heschel

·        All I Really Need To Know I Learned in Kindergarten by Robert Fulghum

·        Hyperion and The Fall of Hyperion by Dan Simmons

·        As a Driven Leaf by Milton Steinberg

·        My Name Is Asher Lev by Chaim Potok

·        The World To Come by Dara Horn

·        The Blessing of A Skinned Knee by Dr. Wendy Mogel

·        Be Yourself by Rabbi Bradley Artson

·        I Asked For Wonder by Rabbi Abraham Joshua Heschel

·        Overcoming Life's Disappointments by Rabbi Harold Kushner

·        Good Omens by Neil Gaiman


Readings:

1.      "Near and Far" and "How to Light Shabbat Candles" from www.myjewishlearning.com

2.      "What Is It About Bedtime?" by Menachem Creditor http://www.seventyfaces.com/dvar/rabbicreditor/what-it-about-bedtime

3.      "Be Yourself" by Rabbi Bradley Artson, http://www.myjewishlearning.com/texts/Bible/Weekly_Torah_Portion/reeh_artson5762.shtml

 


---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Jun 22, 2009

a wonderful article from Alban on Evaluation, Change, and Assessment (adapted for use in Jewish communities)

heade

How Will We Know?

by Sarah B. Drummond (adapted for use in Jewish communities)

Spiritual leaders often rely as much on sacred inspiration as they do on a strategic plan. In even more cases, they rely on intuition and gut feelings when putting a new program on the ground. Leaders have a hunch that there is a need to reach out to a population, to serve a community, or to try something new. So they make a foray into new territory to give something a try. If that foray goes well, they must backtrack to answer crucial questions about leadership, resources, and sustainability. Program planning models can help them do this, just as they help in the creation of new initiatives or the re-creation of lapsed initiatives. Even programs that appear to be working well "on their own" cannot continue over time without effort, intentionality, and structure.

Leaders tend most often to build upon and strengthen programs that are already up and running than to create new programs. A junior-high youth group emerges from a gaggle of sixth graders playing air hockey after shul. A men's fellowship grows out of an annual fishing trip. A food pantry morphs into a soup kitchen. It is leaders' responsibility to create infrastructures that uphold such initiatives and that anchor programs in the life of a community, connecting them to the resources they will need to sustain life beyond the happenstance and haphazard phase. The theoretical resources that have been most helpful to me in midcourse, whereby a free-flowing activity becomes a structured program offering, have come from the world of institutional change theory. The more we understand about change as leaders, the better equipped we are to guide the change toward fulfilling our organization's mission as effectively and faithfully as possible.

New programs in a community—even a historic community like a long-established shul or university—are like teabags in a cup of hot water. Over time, they change the color and nature of their setting, even if just a little. Change leadership theory can help a person responsible for leading or creating a program to consider what must go into such a program and the institutional change it will, by nature, create.

Harvard Business School's John Kotter proposes eight steps toward program planning in an institutional setting to create a program or change initiative that is bound to succeed. Each of Kotter's steps has something special to say to a leader in a religious organization, but there are three in particular to highlight here: urgency, communication of the change vision, and short-term wins. I single out these because, in my experience, they are the steps religious organizations skip most frequently, at the peril of their programs' success.

First, urgency: I once heard that a rabbi telling a shul to change when it sees no reason to do so is like a doctor prescribing chemotherapy to someone who comes in complaining of a headache. A leader who urges change without first helping participants to see why change is necessary is bound to fail. Conversely, to frighten participants into willingness to change is both unethical and manipulative. It is common in religious organizations for leaders to cry wolf, scaring stakeholders with "the sky is falling" warnings to promote a particular agenda. Leaders might, without ill intent, frighten each other and parishioners with dramatic presentations on declines in membership or giving. Yet I have never heard of a shul membership drive that succeeded when the motivation of those doing the evangelism was fear. Finding the right level of urgency is an art in leadership.

Second, communicating the change vision: We all know that participants in religious organizations tend to be busy people, often "joiners" who participate in numerous other communities. Although this is not always true, it is true often enough that leaders must consider how to communicate change to over-stimulated people. In the case of many change initiatives in religious organizations, communications are designed for the deeply involved and over-conscientious. The very involved are precious members of faith communities, but communications about change should not aim for them. They should aim toward the middle—the attention span and engagement of the typical person, rather than the especially invested member. If we communicate clearly and often, the very attentive participants in the faith community may be puzzled by the frequency, but the word will get out.

Third, generating quick wins: Change tends to move slowly in religious organizations. When change happens slowly, it is hard to see. Think of the proverbial activity of "watching grass grow." Leaders need to be mindful that the energy that moves a change effort ahead comes from enthusiastic participants who want to see change; if those participants cannot see change, energy is bound to flag. Kotter suggests that leaders must build in short-term successes that make a visible splash in order to keep energy for change running high.

Of these three, the nature of visioning in religious organizations has a special consequence. In faith-related institutions such as shuls, participants might hold a variety of images about the true mission of the organization. In a business setting, one can assume that all hope the business will be profitable. In a religious organization, however, some might see a successful ministry program as one that brings in new disciples, while others want to take better care of current members. Some might see individual spirituality as most important, while others believe that communal togetherness is the ideal. In such a context, where it is not uncommon to find a row of ten people, no two of whom agree on what the organization is truly "for," talking and thinking about vision are crucial.

When creating a new program or renewing a continuing program, leaders must describe what success would look like. They then must talk together, early and often, about how they will know whether that vision of success is coming to life. Because it is easy to forget to ask these questions during a program planning process, I encourage leaders to ask themselves continually while designing their programs, "How will I know?" How will I know if we are meeting our goals? How will I know if we are making the right kind of progress? When leaders are mentally in "planning mode," they focus a great deal of their energy on the programs they are planning and what successful programming demands. Yet the program's success is not meant to stand only on whether participants enjoyed it. Rather, the program is meant to bring about transformation in the lives of individuals and communities. How will we know if this is happening, especially if our attention is consumed by making the program function?

Leaders in religious organizations must consider process and outcomes simultaneously. If the process associated with a program—the lived experience of a program initiative—goes poorly, the program will fail to attract or retain participants. If participants attend entertaining programs but experience no growth or transformation, the process might be excellent, but the outcome will not live up to its goals. During program planning, leaders must work together to build in both process evaluation and outcomes evaluation. That means they must have a mental, and eventually written, idea about both what a successful initiative might be and do, and what kinds of transformation they would like to encourage.

All life is cyclical in some way, and even historic ministry programs wax and wane over time. If leaders are focused mostly or exclusively on program offerings rather than on the goal toward which those programs strive, they can easily get stuck. The program offering becomes distanced from its original goal and stops achieving that goal, and then the program outlives its purpose. If leaders put purpose first, they are free to change program offerings as time and circumstance dictate. Over time, different means are required to meet the same goal. Leaders who put the program's goals first do not get too attached to particular means for reaching those goals, providing the opportunity to always keep their shuls focused and fresh.

Comment on this article on the Alban Roundtable blog

__________________________________________________________

Adapted from Holy Clarity: The Practice of Planning and Evaluation by Sarah B. Drummond. 


---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Jun 18, 2009

NJ Jewish News: "Conservative movement hosts educators’ confab"

Conservative movement hosts educators' confab
http://www.njjewishnews.com/njjn.com/061809/njConservativeMovementHosts.html
Johanna Ginsberg, NJJN Staff Writer

What does a glow stick have to do with learning to daven? Which of the multiple intelligences does a Passover seder address? And why should high school students put Abraham on trial for the attempted murder of Isaac?

The answers are:

1. Just about everything, according to Alex Weinberg, author of the Siddur Sim Shalom Remix 2.0 curriculum.

2. All of them, according to Suzi Adelson Wainer, director of professional practice at the Partnership for Jewish Learning and Life of United Jewish Communities of MetroWest NJ.

3. It's one of many creative projects that grabs high schoolers' attention and keeps them engaged in Jewish learning, according to Ron Isaacs, rabbi of Temple Sholom in Bridgewater, where he also is a coordinator of the Hebrew high school.

The three educators were among the eight speakers at the Conservative movement's Conference on Synagogue Education held June 10 at Congregation Neve Shalom in Metuchen.

About 70 educators came for the day-long conference sponsored by United Synagogue for Conservative Judaism. It was a first for the Conservative movement's umbrella organization.

"We tried to come up with something that could give the teachers and the principals some in-service [training] — not really filling the total void of CAJE, because I'm not sure anything can, but to try to do this as a service to our congregations and to the neighboring regions," said Michelle Rich, director of education and youth activities for USCJ's New Jersey Region.

CAJE is the Coalition for the Advancement of Jewish Education, which held a national Jewish education conference every summer for 33 years but canceled the 2009 conference due to the economic climate.

The USCJ conference covered tot Shabbats and Hebrew high school and just about everything in between.

"I want people to walk away with new methodologies, new ideas, something to recharge their batteries," said Rich.

Weinberg, a Princeton native who serves as director of congregational education at Chizuk Amuno Congregation in Baltimore, was the clear conference draw. His innovative methods for teaching prayer are based on experiential learning.

For example, in explaining that glow stick-davening relationship, he said that when he begins a session on the "Yotzer Or" — "Creator of Light" — prayer, he distributes glow sticks to his students and has them identify their own association with light.

"When I do this with kids, they're lying on their backs, they're holding their glow sticks over their heads, and there's a big, long string. They say what their connection to light is and put their glow stick on the string and it's like a whole starry night," Weinberg said.

He said that when the youngsters get to actually talking about the prayer after that experience, working through the siddur text "they have that anchor…to guide them through that discussion."

The educators walked away wowed by his presentation.

"I came just for him, " said Leah Beker, director of the religious school at Temple Beth Shalom in Livingston. "We try all the time to add more to our tefila curriculum and make it more meaningful and successful, and I know he's another part of the puzzle that will help with my program."

Sherri Morris, director of education at Congregation Beth El in South Orange, called the speaker "impressive" and said she plans to adapt Weinberg's ideas for experiential prayer for a wide community of students at her synagogue.

While some teachers and religious school directors were soaking up what Weinberg had to offer, others were learning in concurrent sessions.

Sam Shapiro from Congregation B'nai Israel in Basking Ridge, just 20 and sporting a baseball cap, was among the younger teachers at the conference. He started his day at a session run by Dr. Shoshana Silberman focusing on how to run great ice breakers at the beginning of class. "I got a great book with a lot of different activities and some good notes on how to start a class off, how to make it active and how to warm kids up with brain teasers to get them interested in a subject, and where to go from there," he said.

A little later in the day, Isaacs was busy sharing tips for running a successful Hebrew high school. Perhaps his most important tip came when he instructed educators to set a goal — student retention. Offering the same creative programming each year sets students' expectations and provides the excitement of anticipation, he pointed out.

Meanwhile Wainer taught about multiple intelligences by analyzing the Passover seder — which parts of the ritual involve math, analysis, movement, art, and more.

Some educators attended the conference because they missed CAJE; most, however, said they came to learn.

"You need to take every opportunity to expand whatever knowledge base you have," said Gail Buchbinder, religious school director at Temple Beth Ahm-Yisrael in Springfield. "These conferences are chock full of those sort of experiences. You see something new in the field, you meet with your colleagues — it's a treat. If you come away with one big idea, it's great. If you get more than that, it's a bonus."



---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Jun 17, 2009

Announcing Kesharim Independent Minyan Partnership Grants

Announcing Kesharim Independent Minyan Partnership Grants

In 2008 the USCJ Kesharim Committee awarded 6 grants to Independent Minyanim who arranged partnerships with USCJ congregations or regions.  We are pleased to announce a new Request for Proposals (RFP) to be awarded in early September, 2009.   
This project's goal is to build on and strengthen the growing movement of independent minyanim, enabling and empowering Jewishly committed young adults to develop the communities, programs, and initiatives they seek within the Halachic framework of Conservative Judaism. 

The initial grantees used the funds in a variety of ways, including:the purchas of
food and utensils for Shabbat kiddush and meals; purchase of siddurim, chumashim, or other objects used to enhance the prayer experience; sharing the costs of a partner congregational educational program (to subsidize and encourage minyan participants to attend); printing and copying some promotional materials; and  providing a scholarship to the Mechon Hadar independent minyan conference in Boston. For a copy of the RFP and application, click here, Applications.  Proposals are are due by August 1.

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

MSNBC/The Washington Post: "PBS to ban new religious shows"

MSN Tracking Image
  MSNBC.com

PBS to ban new religious shows: Compromise ends threat to stations that already broadcast church services
By Paul Farh, The Washington Post
updated 2:14 a.m. PT, Wed., June 17, 2009

The Public Broadcasting Service agreed yesterday to ban its member stations from airing new religious TV programs, but permitted the handful of stations that already carry "sectarian" shows to continue doing so.

The vote by PBS's board was a compromise from a proposed ban on all religious programming. Such a ban would have forced a few stations around the country to give up their PBS affiliation if they continued to broadcast local church services and religious lectures.

Until now, PBS stations have been required to present programming that is noncommercial, nonpartisan and nonsectarian. But the definition of "nonsectarian" programming was always loosely interpreted, and the rule had never been strictly enforced. PBS began reviewing the definition and application of those rules last year in light of the transition to digital TV and with many stations streaming programs over their Web sites. The definition doesn't cover journalistic programs about religion or discussion programs that don't favor a particular religious point of view.

The vote at PBS's headquarters in Arlington was good news for five PBS member stations that carry religious programs. Among them are KBYU in Salt Lake City, which is operated by an affiliate of the Mormon Church; KMBH in Harlingen, Tex., operated by the local Catholic diocese; and WLAE in New Orleans, operated by a Catholic lay organization.

The vote also means that WHUT, operated by Howard University in the District, won't be required to drop its telecasts of "Mass for Shut-Ins," a weekly Catholic Mass that has aired on the station since 1996 and locally in Washington for more than 50 years.

But, warned by PBS of the upcoming review, WHUT put the program's producer, the Archdiocese of Washington, on notice that it would drop the program if the PBS board voted to ban religious programs. The archdiocese then made alternative arrangements, negotiating a contract with WDCW (Channel 50) to pick up the half-hour program on Sunday mornings.

Moving the program, which is broadcast free by WHUT, will be disruptive to viewers, said Susan Gibbs, the archdiocese's spokeswoman, and expensive — the contract with WDCW will cost $60,000 per year.

"I think we were good for WHUT because we brought a committed and dedicated audience to their channel," she said. "It would have been nice for us to continue being there, but I think we were good for them, too." Gibbs was unsure whether the contract could be broken.

WHUT General Manager Jennifer Lawson said yesterday she didn't know where the program would end up. "It's not a question of taking them back," said Lawson, who chaired the PBS committee that recommended the policies adopted by PBS's 27-member board yesterday. "It's my understanding they made a decision to move to Channel 50 because they found some advantages. The decision is for them to make."

PBS's board also voted yesterday to allow PBS stations to air religious programs on digital TV channels and Web sites they operate as long as these channels don't include PBS programs or brand identification. This could open the way for cash-strapped PBS stations to lease unused digital TV channels to religious broadcasters, as station KOCE in Orange County, Calif., has already done.


URL: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/31400910/ns/us_news-washington_post/


© 2009 MSNBC.com

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Jun 15, 2009

Rabbi Ronald Konigsburg on Conservative Judaism: "We Won’t Be Fooled Again"

Rabbi Ronald Konigsburg: "We Won't Be Fooled Again"
http://commonsensejews.blogspot.com/2009/06/we-wont-be-fooled-again.html

There has been a lot of ink spilled over the last month or so about what is wrong with Conservative Judaism. Some synagogues have rebelled against the United Synagogue for Conservative Judaism (USCJ) for its perceived inaction in these hard times. Some blame rabbis for the decline in membership and financial resources; others blame the "Movement" for not doing more to help. Some blame the Jewish Theological Seminary of America (JTSA) for not training better rabbis and some blame lay leadership and the members of our congregations for not demanding more from their spiritual leaders or for creating synagogues that cater to insuring that members remain members even if they have little or no interest in doing anything Jewish.

There is plenty of anecdotal evidence to go around. Rabbis can cite many examples of members who wanted a quick fix for a Bar or Bat Mitzvah with little or no preparation and then leave the congregation right after the last child has his or her ceremony. Lay leadership can tell stories of rabbis who don't seem to understand "what congregants want these days". Everyone wants to blame USCJ for not doing more to help congregations but there is very little specific that they want the USCJ to do (other than to stop charging dues when it's perceived that they offer no services in exchange). Everyone wants change, but it seems that they want someone else to do the changing. In the end, as the song in this title, the more things change the more they stay the same.
My friend, Richard S. Moline, writing in the Jewish Week (5/21/09 "Conservatives must look in the mirror")[ http://jta.org/news/article/2009/05/21/1005348/op-ed-owning-the-conservative-movements-challenges-and-its-successes ] writes the following:

"But it does trouble me that we have not successfully created Shabbat Communities in most of our congregations. It troubles me that most students do not find the level of commitment in their home communities that they do in USY or Ramah or Koach. It does trouble me that if they do find it, it's likely not in the Conservative movement, so they may become involved in other communities not by design but by default. And it does trouble me that our clergy and laity become more concerned about institutional viability than about motivating themselves and others to live fully Jewish lives. "

"What can we do about it? It's easy to assign responsibility, but is courageous to shoulder it. If I were speaking to the key leaders of the movement, professional and lay, I would start by handing each of them a mirror and asking them to take a long hard look. "  "It's easy to blame the institutions – and there is plenty of blame to be assigned to them all. But how many rabbis tell their president that in order to be a more effective leader, the two must study together for an hour every other week? How many presidents tell their rabbi the same thing? How much time do we spend teaching and encouraging people to observe Shabbat or to keep kosher, compared to the amount of time we spend making the bar or bat mitzvah schedule or collecting membership dues?"

Sometimes I feel that congregations don't understand the Prado Principle and end up spending 80% of their time catering to the bottom 20% of our congregants, who may or may not appreciate all that a synagogue is doing for them. I believe that every Jew is important, but there clearly is a much larger community out there that is looking for something more than just a ceremony for their children. Perhaps what they want is only a feeling deep inside that they can't really express very well, but they know that they need to address that feeling and that our synagogues can (and sometimes do) fulfill that need, at least partially, at least some of the time, at least a couple of times a year. We need to do better. National organizations cannot do this for us. It is not a Lay or Rabbinic problem. It is nothing less than a redefinition of what a synagogue is and what it does. It has nothing to do with Jewish Law or ritual questions, it has to do with the nature of an organization and how we answer basic questions about life and meaning.
There are rabbis who think that our members want to know the details of the laws of Judaism. They need this information in order to accept those laws into their lives. Every place I turn to, however, I see lay leaders and ordinary Jews saying, "just tell me what I need to do and I will try my best to live by Jewish Law". They don't want uncertainty; they get enough of that on the internet. They want honest truth to live by and a way of looking at the world upon which they can build a life in which they can be proud.

There are lay members of our congregations who want us to be more "spiritual" without any understanding about what that means. God is all around them and yet they think that they need to do something esoteric to acquire spirituality. Rabbis talk about Mitzvot and Social Action as ways into the spiritual realm but nobody seems to be listening. Social Action and Political Action in our congregations is anemic and half hearted. Let us create a menu of items which lay members can incorporate into their lives and let them see how by doing God's work, they can find the spiritual fulfillment they seek. As they grow in deeds, we can then reframe their actions as Mitzvot and Tikun Olam. As their actions become more spiritual so will their need to study and pray as well.

There are lay leaders who think that if they change the service then people will flock to the synagogue. I think that they are partially correct. Conservative services are boring. People are expected to sit quietly for hours at a time while things happen on the bima that they don't understand. Opera had this problem that was solved by putting a screen above the stage and having a simultaneous translation of the opera on the screen. That might help our services, even though we do have translations (and transliterations) in our siddurim. We have lost the drama of the Torah reading. We have lost what stirs the soul in prayer. Our music is old, our approach is old and our membership is old and getting older. Synagogues compete today with multiplex movie theaters, weekly concerts, special events and exciting sporting events (football, NASCAR, even hunting!!) for our members' time on Friday night and on Saturday morning. The good people at Synagogue 3000 [synagogue3000.org] say we can get thousands of people in our congregations, just like our colleagues in the mega churches down the street, if we learn the lessons that they have learned. It is not about the liturgy, that does not change; it is the approach to the liturgy, it is the possibility to participate in the service, to be a part of something exciting, in an exciting place. My congregation here in NY ripped out the pews in the first ten rows of the sanctuary (and it is an old venerated synagogue and building), and replaced the seating with moveable chairs arranged in a semi circle. They got off the bima and put the action right there on the floor, no more than a foot or two in front of the first row of chairs. The members lead parts of the service and everyone takes part in what is going on. The liturgy and the siddur are the same as any other synagogue but the atmosphere is dynamic.

It is not, as the comic character Pogo once said, "We have met the enemy and he is us" rather we need to stop trying to maintain the status quo. I have seen congregations replace a rabbi looking for a new approach to Judaism, only to find that the new guy is the same as the old one. The problem is not just the rabbi; it is the congregation, the leadership, the members and the rabbi. Each one has expectations of the other and is not prepared for the kind of personal change needed to help our communities grow.

  • First, we need to change ourselves, to break out of our old Jewish habits and see our faith in a new and deeper way.
  • Second, we need to challenge our friends and members to a Judaism that does make demands on them, but they will quickly see the spiritual growth that arises when they confront those demands
  • Third, we need to build a community where study, prayer and community service are the backbone of what we stand for. This kind of synagogue can compete with the multitude of distractions and will make a synagogue a place worthy of our time and energy; a place where every Jew is welcome and a place to where we can go to find our way in life.
  • And finally, we need to demand from our institutions the kind of support that will help us along the way. The educative resources, the connections to national service projects, the advice and support we need to help us transform our own lives and the lives of those in our community. These institutions can't transform others on our behalf; they only can and should supply the resources that we need to do the job ourselves.
It is time to stop looking in the mirror to find the problem and to start looking forward and creating new and innovative solutions. Let us go forward, professionals and laity as partners to get the work done.

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Google Alerts <googlealerts-noreply@google.com>
Date: Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 4:54 PM
Subject: Google Alert - "Conservative Judaism"
To: rabbicreditor@gmail.com


Google Blogs Alert for: "Conservative Judaism"

Jewish Common Sense by Rabbi Randall J. Konigsburg: We Won't Be ...
By Rabbi Randall Konigsburg
There has been a lot of ink spilled over the last month or so about what is wrong with Conservative Judaism. Some synagogues have rebelled against the United Synagogue for Conservative Judaism (USCJ) for its perceived inaction in these ...
Jewish Common Sense by Rabbi... - http://commonsensejews.blogspot.com/


 This as-it-happens Google Alert is brought to you by Google.

Remove this alert.
Create another alert.
Manage your alerts.


Forward: "Conservative Judaism Searches for its Identity"

Forward: "Conservative Judaism Searches for its Identity"
By Alison Cies, June 15, 2009.
http://www.forward.com/articles/107878/

Conservative Judaism, struggling with decades of declining membership and an abrupt, sweeping change in its senior leadership, heard a call in early June from three prominent rabbis for a rethinking of its mission.

The three rabbis, New York-based and all under 45, launched their broadsides from the stage of a packed auditorium at the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, in an evening program titled "Conservative Judaism: The Next Generation." They called for new directions in the religious approach and practice of their denomination, the centrist movement that once dominated the American Jewish landscape.

The seminary's newly minted chancellor, Arnold Eisen, introduced the presentation as "the culmination" of a smaller forum of several dozen Conservative leaders brought together by the seminary to reexamine the movement's future. It was intended, Eisen said, as a response to the "enormous concern among Jews at the decline" of the once-dominant centrist Jewish denomination.

"We found a new universal desire to get the movement back to its strength and vitality, looking at structure, quality and message," Eisen told his audience.

The panelists were sharply divided, however, on what new directions to take. One participant, Rabbi Johanna Samuels, a writer and former rabbi of Congregation Habonim on Manhattan's liberal Upper West Side, called for a greater emphasis on social justice and activism. "We need to do something bigger than ourselves," she told the audience. "My goal is for us to get people out in the world to help heal the world. That's the best kind of Conservative practice." "We need to get out of this institutional malaise and self-focused mentality and get out into the world and do work," Samuels said. "Build houses, work for justice. We'll come back to our institutions invigorated."

By contrast, Rabbi Jeremy Kalmanofsky of Congregation Ansche Chesed, also on the Upper West Side, urged greater emphasis on prayer and observance of ritual. "Conservative Judaism offers a deep, religious path," he declared emphatically. "The goal is for all synagogues to experience its depth."

"We need to fix the soul and fix the body," Kalmanofsky said. "These deeds will sanctify us and make the world a better world."

The third panelist, Rabbi Elliot Cosgrove of Park Avenue Synagogue on the affluent Upper East Side, argued that the separate denominations of American Judaism are losing their relevance among younger Jews. "Denominations are changing," Cosgrove said. "Lines aren't black and white. These lines are very slippery."

In the early years of Conservative Judaism a century ago, Cosgrove said, "Americans were seeking to make sense of their lives as immigrants." Now, he said, "This story is over. We've arrived. We're here." The question Jews ask today, he said, is not "how to arrive in a secular culture, but how to cross back over to tradition."

Conservative Judaism arose early in the 20th century as a centrist bloc, between the staunch traditionalism of Orthodox Judaism, which preached full observance of rabbinic law, and the more permissive Reform movement, which viewed the laws as guidelines for the individual. Conservative Judaism preached observance of the law but claimed rules had evolved through history and could continue to evolve. During the boom years of postwar suburban Jewish life it was the dominant wing of American Judaism. Surveys showed it claiming the loyalty of more than 40 percent of the community, with the rest divided between Reform, Orthodox and non-identified. During the last several decades the Conservative movement has been in decline, and it now shows up in surveys second in numbers to Reform Judaism.

Eisen, 58, seminary chancellor since July 2008, is one of three new chief executives who have taken the reins of the Conservative movement's three main institutions in the past year. In October 2008 the Rabbinical Assembly, the union of Conservative rabbis, selected Rabbi Julie Schoenfeld, 43, as its new executive vice-president. This past spring the United Synagogue of Conservative Judaism, serving the movement's 780 congregations, chose Rabbi Steven Wernick, 41, as its executive vice-president. All three replaced incumbents who had been in their posts since the 1980s.

Interviewed by the Forward after the session, Rabbi Cosgrove said that the message of Conservative Judaism remains "strong, true, and relevant." However, he said "the movement needs to do a better job at communicating this message to American Jewry as a whole." The June 3 symposium, participants said, was not aimed at reaching that larger audience but at advancing the internal discussion within Conservative Judaism about how best to approach the community at large. Rabbi Kalmanofsky expressed his doubts that anyone outside of Conservative Judaism had even been in attendance.

Individual rabbis, Samuels told the Forward, have begun the work in their pulpits. "In our own ways we're reaching a broader audience," she said. What remains is for the movement as a whole to develop a coordinated approach.

J.J. Goldberg contributed reporting.



---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Jun 13, 2009

June 22: Interfaith conversation on marriage equality

Politics, Religion and Discourse: A Conversation about Same Sex Marriage

Monday, June 22, 2009

7PM at GRACE CATHEDRAL – 1100 California Street, San Francisco

RSVP to events@fablaw.com or call 510.451.3300 ext. 333

 

Panelists:

Bishop Gene RobinsonEpiscopal Church, New Hampshire

Rabbi Doug KahnExecutive Director of the San Francisco based Jewish Community Relations Council

Bishop Yvette FlunderThe Fellowship, a multi-denominational fellowship of 110 Pastors and Christian leaders representing 56 churches and faith-based organizations throughout the United States Mexico and Africa.

Reverend Lindi RamsdenExecutive Director of the Unitarian Universalist Legislative Ministry, California

Joe TumanPolitical Analyst, CBS 5 Eyewitness News, Professor, SF State University, Author "Political Communication in American Campaigns" (Sage, 2008)

 
Moderator Bishop Marc AndrusEpiscopal Church, Northern California

Jun 12, 2009

CNN: Deborah Lipstadt on US Holocaust Museum: "Witness to history and horror"

http://www.cnn.com/2009/CRIME/06/12/lipstadt.museum.shooting/index.html

Commentary: Witness to history and horror
By Deborah E. Lipstadt
Special to CNN

Editor's note: Deborah E. Lipstadt is currently Resnick Invitational Scholar at the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum and Dorot Professor of Modern Jewish and Holocaust Studies at Emory University. She is the author of "History on Trial: My Day in Court with a Holocaust Denier." For more information, read here

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- I write this from my office in the Center for Advanced Holocaust Studies at the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum where I have been privileged to have had a fellowship for the past semester. Up until Wednesday at 12:50 p.m., it had been a perfect visit. Everything a scholar could hope for: exceptional scholarly resources and a magnificent museum staff.

When I arrive each morning, long before the doors open to the public, I always marvel at the people waiting to enter. They represent every religion, ethnic group, and nationality. In the past few weeks I've seen hundreds of school groups as well as Annapolis midshipmen, scouts, FBI trainees and police force members.

They come to learn about the consequences of hate and prejudice. And Wednesday the entire world was given a graphic reminder of what that hatred can produce when a white supremacist, anti-Semitic, Holocaust denier, entered the building and allegedly shot a guard before being wounded himself.

I was on the level below the shooting in a classroom preparing to begin a lecture on Holocaust denial. I was going to speak about those who claim, among other things, that 6 million Jews were not murdered by the Nazis, that the gas chambers never existed, that the "Diary of Anne Frank" is a fraud, and that the survivors who claim it happened are psychopaths and liars.

They contend that the Jews have made this all up to win the sympathy of the world and to get reparations -- i.e. money -- from the Germans and other perpetrators. It is classic anti-Semitism.

As I was about to begin the lecture, we heard the shots. Then came the screams followed by an eerie silence. We locked the door and waited. Soon a staff member told us to exit the building at once. As we walked out of the classroom hundreds of people poured out of bathrooms, classrooms, and other areas to which they had been herded in the moments after the shooting.

We gathered on the grassy area across from the museum and within seconds museum staff appeared with signs: 1,2, 3, 4. Visitors were directed to gather in front of the sign for the floor they were on when they were evacuated. This enabled families, friends, and school groups to find one another.

Afraid that there might be another shooter lurking about, the police moved us north towards the Washington Monument. Slowly the school groups and other visitors left. Those of us associated with the museum just waited. There was nothing for us to do but there seemed to be a certain comfort in staying together.

I stood with a Holocaust survivor who had been at the Visitors Services desk. Someone brought a wheelchair for her. She brushed it aside and pointed at a far younger staff person who had a cast on his leg: "He needs it more than I."

We soon heard that the alleged shooter was an 88-year-old white supremacist. I quickly said: "I can assure you that he was not just a white supremacist." And, as predicted, we learned that he is an anti-Semite, a denier and a racist. It is a jigsaw puzzle which always fits together. In short, he was a hater who needs no rational reason to exercise his hatred.

Then we learned of the death of Officer Johns, a really tall man, who always had a smile and a kind word. He would often kid me about all the stuff I seemed to be perpetually schlepping. I had seen him about 40 minutes before the shooting when I passed the entrance on my way to the classroom where I would be lecturing. The lobby was crowded, a normal day at the Holocaust Museum. Now no day that ends here quietly and safely will be normal.

I sit in this building surrounded by offices in which computers blink, half filled coffee cups are all over the place, and purses and briefcases sit near people's desks. When the SWAT team reached this floor and evacuated people they were told "Leave. NOW." As one of my office neighbors later said to me, "When men with guns and dogs tell you to leave you don't stop and gather up your stuff. You leave. NOW. "

In the library, laptops are sitting on tables and backpacks are on the floor. All the paraphernalia is normal. Just the people are missing.

We who were here have so much to be thankful for:

For Officer Johns who gave his life defending this museum.

For the guards who did precisely what they are trained to do and did it so very well.

For the fact that this man's hate resulted in the death of "only" one man and not of scores more.

Above all, we have to be thankful for the existence of this place. It is a place that stands to teach about the consequences of hatred and prejudice. This week it taught that lesson in the most horrifying of ways.

Today the building will be full again. There will be staff members and, we hope, people who have decided not to let the haters win.

They know that the only way to defeat those who spread evil is by not letting them stop us. Who ever thought that there would be a time when coming to a museum which teaches about hatred, prejudice and anti-Semitism would itself be an act of defiance?

That time is now.

The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of Deborah Lipstadt.

 
 
 




 
 



---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Jweekly: "Unity Program’s first local grads break down walls of Muslim-Jewish relations"

http://jweekly.com/article/full/38320/unity-programs-first-local-grads-break-down-walls-of-muslim-jewish-relation/

Unity Program's first local grads break down walls of Muslim-Jewish relations
stacey palevsky, staff writer

Imagine: Jewish and Muslim teenagers laughing together, walking arm in arm, making plans to hang out in the summer.

They seem like unlikely scenarios — but thanks to the Unity Program, a project of the S.F.-based nonprofit Abraham's Vision, they're a reality. The program graduated its first class of Bay Area students May 31.

"I felt an invisible wall between me and the Jewish community, and now I feel this wall has been completely demolished," said Shakeera Shoukat, 17, during the graduation ceremony.

BAunity
Aaron Lerner. photos/stacey palevsky
Twenty-nine Jewish and Muslim students graduated from the program this year. Students at Berkeley Midrasha worked with students from the Islamic Cultural Center of Northern California in Oakland, and students from Peninsula Havurah High in Los Altos Hills worked with the Muslim American Society in Santa Clara. About 100 parents and friends attended the commencement ceremony.

"In the Bay Area, we think we're so accepting, so liberal and open-minded, but we all still have a lot to learn," said Marsha Rosen-blatt, 17, of Oakland. "The Unity Program helped me realize that. It was such a valuable experience."

Throughout the school year, Unity Program participants met weekly, in separate Jewish and Muslim groups, for classes that were co-taught by a Jewish and a Muslim educator — Samantha Witman and Yasmeen Peer. The teachers also led monthly discussions and field trips that brought together the Jewish and Muslim students.

During the graduation ceremony, 14 teenagers representing both communities addressed the audience. Muslim students talked about how they were at first apprehensive to meet their Jewish peers; likewise, Jewish students wondered if they could really become friends with Muslim teenagers.

Those fears proved to be unfounded.

BAunity2
Shakeera Shoukat
"I never imagined that I would be able to talk about [the Middle East] and not be constantly harassed for identifying with Zionism — yet it happened, and now my mind is more open to new possibilities," said Aaron Lerner, 18, of Palo Alto.

In their classes, students learned about each other's religious traditions, the history of the Middle East and the current challenges facing Israel and the Palestinian territories.

They visited places representing both of their faith and cultural traditions — a synagogue and a mosque, the Contemp-orary Jewish Museum and the Asian Art Museum.

During their graduation speeches, they talked about how the Unity Program taught them tolerance, acceptance and how to listen to opinions that differ from their own. They described being surprised and excited to learn about the numerous similarities between Jews and Muslims.

They said they were grateful, privileged and transformed by the experience.

Aaron Hahn Tapper, a professor of Jewish studies at the University of San Francisco, created the program when he lived in New York. He expanded the program upon moving to the Bay Area in 2007. To date, 134 students have graduated from the Unity Program.

His organization reflects the unity he aims to inspire in American teen-agers. His co-director is a Palestinian woman, Huda Abu Arquob. They both spoke at the graduation ceremony before the teens addressed the audience.

"We refuse to believe future generations will not live in a world that is better than this one," Hahn Tapper said.

The program intends to add a third Bay Area partnership this coming fall, which will mean an additional 72 participating students during the 2009-10 school year.

"To live in a country that was built upon the tenet of tolerance I need to be tolerant, and to be tolerant I need to understand," said Meryem Kamil, 17, of Santa Clara.

"Through Abraham's Vision I can now say that I understand the need for programs such as this one and the need for interfaith dialogue because change begins with small steps."

These 29 students have taken their first.


Jun 8, 2009

Save a Life this Sunday

Save a life: http://tinyurl.com/ngx27z

Jun 5, 2009

Naso 5769/2009: “Personal Status and Jewish Leadership”

Naso 5769/2009: "Personal Status and Jewish Leadership"
© Rabbi Menachem Creditor

Dedicated to Jon Galinson 
Click Here: http://www.jweekly.com/

*****************************

Given the enormous length of Parashat Naso, there are so many possible directions for exploration that it's hard to choose just one! Naso is the longest Torah Portion, with 176 verses. (Interesting to note that the longest chapter in the entire Hebrew Bible (Psalm 119) has 176 verses, and the longest tractate of the Talmud (Bava Batra) has 176 pages!)

Let's begin with an aerial view. The typical topics for discussing Parashat Naso are the Sotah, the Priestly Blessing, and the Nazir. The Sotah is a woman suspected of adultery by her husband and who undergoes the trial of "bitter water" (Num. 5:11-31). The Priestly blessing (Num.6:22-26) is offered by the children of Aaron to the Israelite people. The Nazir is a Jew who takes a temporary ascetic vow aspiring to a higher level of holiness (Num. 6:1-21).

Here are the thematic distinctions: whereas the Priest is born into his elite status, the Nazir takes a formal vow to change his status, and the Sotah acquires her status by the accusation of another. 

*****************************

The similarities of the Kohen and the Nazir have been noted: both cannot consume alcohol during their sacred moments, both are described as "holy to God," neither can expose themselves to the remains of the dead, and in both instances, the head is the focus of sanctity – the Nazir's hair may not be cut and the Kohen's head is adorned with special headgear.

The similarities of the Nazir and the Sotah begin with their immediate proximity in the Torah. The Gemara (Sotah 2a) suggests that that the Torah is subtly conveying a suggestion to the witnesses of the Sotah ordeal: that one who witnesses the disgrace of the Sotah should accept upon himself the heightened spiritual responsibility of being a Nazir, refraining from the consumption of wine for a thirty-day period. Realizing that alcohol can contribute to sin, the Torah recommends that the observers take steps to protect themselves from making the same mistake. Additionally, the Nazir vows not to cut his hair in a show of faith, and the Sotah's hair is exposed in a show of disgrace.

But the similarities run deeper than that - Choosing to be a Nazir isn't seen by all as a virtue, and the Sotah isn't seen by all as bearing guilt. 

Shimon HaTzadik (who was himself a High Priest) refused to eat a Nazir's sacrificial offerings because he felt they were part of a person's excessive guilt or enthusiasm and were not proper gifts (Num. Rabbah 10:7). Rabbi Matt Berkowitz points out that the Nazir's vow is a distancing agent from the community even as it sanctifies the self to God.

Rabbi Elazar portrays the biblical heroine Channah as having threatened to use the Sotah technique as a means for taking control of her own destiny and have a child. If God wouldn't address her infertility, she would seclude herself with another man in front of her husband Elkanah. And when she would seclude herself, they would give her to drink the Sotah water. Rabbi Elazar has Channah say to God: "And You will not belie Your Torah, for it is stated [with regard to an innocent woman who drinks the sotah waters]: then she shall be proven innocent and she shall bear seed (Num. 5:28)"  [Berachot 31b]

And so the Nazir isn't clearly 'good' and the Sotah isn't clearly 'bad' – both are changes in status that can happen for myriad reasons.

*****************************

But what of the Kohen? The role is inherited. Kohanim stand where they do because of their parents and their grandparents. And this entitles them to bless the community. The phrases of Birkat Kohanim demonstrate the holiness of the priestly role in a uniquely powerful formula, translated and retranslated and ultimately untranslatable. One such inadequate offering is:

"May God bless you and protect you! 
May God shine God's face upon you and be gracious to you! 
May God lift up God's face to you and grant you peace! (Num. 6:22-27)"

The first line actually contains two brachot: "yevarechecha" – blessing – and "veyishmerecha" – guarding. 

The Netziv (Rav Naphtali Tzvi Yehudah Berlin, 1817-1893) understood "bracha/blessing" to include the blessing appropriate for each individual. According to what God has already given you (i.e., according to your current station in life), shall you be further blessed. If God has helped you become a skilled locksmith, may you have blessing in that pursuit. In other words, in this Priestly Blessing for the general  community, the first clause speaks to each individual.

But regarding "shmirah/guarding": every blessing, says the Netziv, requires guarding, protecting, so that it will not turn into a stumbling block. If on is a student of Torah, she needs guarding from arrogance and from forgetting her learning. If one is wealthy, he needs guarding from developing an unhealthy, even evil, attitude towards his money and guarding from theft or loss. And if one is a Kohen, they must not become proud and lord their status over someone else.

The Netziv points out that every blessing needs careful guarding. 

We are who we are, after all. We are born to parents who serve, among other things, as diving boards into the world. I, myself, would not have been so comfortable in the world of Jewish music and spirituality if my parents hadn't created such a conducive world for me. I entered my rabbinic studies at JTS as "Rabbi Creditor's son."  My father's deepest blessing to me was to allow me to be my own person, eventually my own rabbi.

A similar message needs to be shared regarding acquired status. Once we achieve our own name, our own resume, we need to remain humble and careful. The words we share when occupying leadership roles can have serious impacts upon the lives of others.

As the Netziv's father, Rabbi Chayim of Volozhin writes in his masterpiece the Nefesh HaCHayim, "Despite two people committing the same sin, their punishments are not the same. Perhaps one is gifted with a superior understanding of the world due to the root of their soul (what we might call 'innate abilities'), and that one's punishment is in accordance with the damage they can cause. The harm a person can cause reaches as far as the Source of their soul. (NH 1:14)"

So what of the Sotah, the Nazir, and the Kohen?

From the outside, the Sotah is vulnerable, the Nazir is righteous, and the Kohen is an inherent vessel of God.  But a deeper glimpse reveals that things aren't always as they seem.

*****************************

While we no longer employ the Sotah ritual, and while we actively dissuade anyone from becoming a Nazir, we do continue some of the priestly traditions. 

The Malbim (Rabbi Meir Leibush ben Yechiel Michel, 1809-1879) explained the model of the Kohen's blessing in the following way: "at times the recipients of God's abundance are not capable of absorbing this abundance in terms of their degree of spirituality, and therefore God chose to transmit the Shefa, or Divine Abundance, by means of Godly people who are servants of God, so that they open the channels of blessing through their deeds, prayers and benedictions, bringing this blessing upon the people. (Malbim on Num. 6:22)"

This is a high order to fill, and traditional commentators consistantly challenged the Priests in their community to live up to a spiritual and ethical ideal in order to deserve their honored status. We see this clearly in the blessing Priests still recite in advance of the duchening, the priestly blessing, whose concluding words are: "God who commanded us to bless God's people Israel with love. (Sotah 39a)" A commanded love, not of God, or of self, but of every last member of the Priest's community.

As our sages Stan Lee and Steve Ditko taught us through their created character Uncle Ben, father of a familiar spider-bitten hero, "With great power comes great responsibility."

The Kohen is perhaps the last semblance of an inherited Jewish communal status, a "yichus" from days of old. But the mantle is a heavy one. Where Kohanim stands to offer Birkat Kohanim, the words that must be coursing through their mind, heart, and soul must be "God has commanded me to bless my sisters and brothers with love."  And where Kahanim no longer stand, the task falls to us all to make those intentions felt around us.

Even inherited status has qualifications. If a Kohen does not embody this ideal, he does not successfully open the channels of blessing. The blessing works only when its birthright is earned, not when its significance is exerted. Priests do not have a monopoly on holiness. Nor do modern Jewish leaders. The privileges of Jewish leadership are many - the right to lead, to teach, to organize the community, and to spend unquantifiable (and unrecorded) moments in the service of God and the Jewish people.

As Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson has taught us: "Proud heirs of the prophets and sages, Jews are members of a people in covenant with God. That covenant was not made merely with Moses and Aaron, but with every Jew, past and present. Each one of us is summoned to a unique relationship with God, one that can become as all-embracing as we allow it to be."

The Sotah's status happened to her. The Nazir opted for his. A Kohen is born into a burdened blessing.

May we all learn from these models, and choose the obligation to bless each other – in love.


---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Very important/troubling piece: Sid Schwartz in the Jewish Week: "This Is Zionism?"

Opinion: This Is Zionism?

by Rabbi Sidney Schwarz
Special to the Jewish Week

http://www.thejewishweek.com/viewArticle/c55_a15922/Editorial__Opinion/Opinion.html

It had been at least 20 years since I was in New York for a Salute to Israel Parade. But it was a happy coincidence.

I was scheduled to be in New York on Monday for a meeting of the board of Rabbis for Human Rights-North America. I came into the city a day early with my wife and 20 year old daughter to enjoy the parade. My daughter marched with a delegation from the University of Maryland Hillel. My wife and I enjoyed being part of the crowd, hearing the Israeli music and watching the floats and delegations of students from synagogues and schools from all around the area.After the parade we heard that there was going to be an Israel-themed concert in

Central Park so we decided to attend. It was a shock to the system.

I was not troubled by the fact that the crowd was predominantly Orthodox. I was raised in an Orthodox day school and I do a lot of work with Orthodox institutions under the auspices of PANIM, the organization that I run in Washington D.C. committed to training young Jews for a lifetime of leadership, service and activism.

Then one speaker launched into a tirade about how every American president since Jimmy Carter had betrayed Israel by courting the favor of Arab nations. Applause. Another speaker announced that Hillary Clinton cared more about Palestinian national aspirations than about Israel's survival. Applause. Candidate for Congress, Elizabeth Berney, slammed Rep. Gary Ackerman (D-NY), chairman of the House Sub-committee on the Middle East for his characterization of Israeli settlement activity in the territories as part of a "destructive dynamic" in the region. More applause.

Then a band launched into a rousing rendition of Am Yisrael Chai. I spent more than 25 years as an activist for Soviet Jewry. This was our theme song signaling solidarity both with the history of our people and with all those oppressed Jews in the world whose cause we championed. A group of young men in their 20's with kippot and tziztzit were right in front of me dancing in a frenzy. But they alternated the verse that meant "the people of Israel lives" with "all the Arabs must die." It rhymed with the Hebrew. Given the way all joined in, it was clear that this was not the first time it was sung.

I leaned over to a young man who was next to me, also wearing a kippah and tzitzit. I nodded at the dancers and asked: "Does this song bother you?" He looked at me with a suspicious look and replied: "This is Zionism."

There were a dozen or so sponsors of the rally including the Zionist Organization of America, Americans for a Safe Israel and the National Council of Young Israel. Rally sponsors cannot control every statement of every speaker and they certainly can not control the actions of those in the audience. Yet the messages from the stage were all in ideological alignment and the MC was generously doling out yasher koachs after each presentation.

The joy of the earlier part of the day changed to outrage and then to deep sadness. I have devoted my entire life to Zionism, Israel and the Jewish people. I ran a Zionist think tank for academics in both Philadelphia and Washington D.C. I brought public officials to Israel as the executive director of the JCRC of Washington D.C. I led Solidarity Missions to Israel during Intifadah II under the auspices of UJC. All three of my children spent a gap year in Israel with Young Judaea Year Course. My organization trains thousands of young people to be proud of their Jewish identity and to be effective advocates for Israel in the public square.

But the Zionism that compels me includes the proposition that a Jewish state will honor the rights of all of its citizens and be true to the prophetic ideals of peace and justice that are elaborated on in the Torah. It does not include anti-Arab sentiments that Israel's new foreign minister, Avigdor Lieberman, wants to enshrine in Israeli law. It does not include a political stance that is destined to put the government of Israel on a collision course with an Obama Administration that seems committed to bringing about a just settlement to the Middle East conflict that has made Arabs and Jews enemies for more than a century. And it certainly does not include a fervor that turns a Jewish solidarity song into an anthem of prejudice and hate.

Jewish leaders are quick to demand that Muslim clergy condemn the extremism that has hijacked Islam into a religion of terrorism and death. We need to make the same demands of the rabbis of institutions whose students make a chillul hashem (a desecration of God's name) by singing "all the Arabs must die". 

Finally, Jews who love Israel and who want peace need to ask themselves how we can reclaim the public discourse about the future of the Jewish state. Islam is not the only religion that is in danger of being hijacked.


____
Rabbi Sid Schwarz is the founder and president of PANIM: The Institute for Jewish Leadership and Values and the author of Judaism and Justice: The Jewish Passion to Repair the World (Jewish Lights). 

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
-- www.netivotshalom.org
-- www.shefanetwork.org
-- menachemcreditor.org

To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Jun 4, 2009

Israel in the Gardens THIS SUNDAY

Having trouble viewing this message? Click here to see it in your browser.

Israel in the Gardens 2009 is quickly approaching and we hope that you are as excited as we are here at the Israel Center. We're asking for your help in making Israel in the Gardens 2009 larger than ever by passing this email along to your co-workers, friends, and family.

On Sunday, June 7, 2009, an estimated 20,000 people will gather at Israel in the Gardens for the hottest and freshest in Israeli music, film, and food in celebration of Jewish Culture, Israel's 61st anniversary and the Tel Aviv centennial.

This year's musical headliner is Ivri Lider. The gifted songwriter, composer, and producer is part of an exciting day awaiting you at the Yerba Buena Gardens. Other musical performances include local Israeli Rock Bands: Yarock and Pitot. Teens, families, young adults and friends of all ages will love the displays, awesome contests and prizes, and vast offerings of ethnic food, culture and fun.

Drop by the Jewish Community Federation of the Greater East Bay's booth for a "Spin for the Pin" experience where you will have the opportunity to answer a question about Israel and win a fabulous "I Love Israel" pin.

Check out our website for all the latest: www.jfed.org

Look us up on Twitter: IsraelinGardens and our event on Facebook: Israel in the Gardens 2009

300 Grand Avenue • Oakland, California 94610 • www.jfed.org