Nov 21, 2010

Rabbi Gary S. Creditor: "Jacob and Esau: Don’t Ask. Don’t Tell."

Jacob and Esau: Don't Ask. Don't Tell.
November 20th, 2010
Rabbi Gary Creditor
Richmond, Virginia
 
In tomorrow morning's Torah portion we read of the very powerful encounter of Esau and Jacob. They have been separated for a very long time. The last time they were in proximity Esau swore to kill his brother because not only had Jacob gotten Esau to give him the birthright, Jacob had tricked their father to give him the blessing of the first born, thus ratifying the earlier transfer. The second born, Jacob, had in both instances, gotten that which should have gone to the first born, Esau. Many chapters ago, Esau hated his brother. Now they will finally meet. There are many questions demanding to be answered. We sit on the edge of our chairs waiting to see what will happen.
 
If I was Jacob I have at least two questions on the tip of my tongue: Do you still hate me? Do you still want to kill me? And: How is our father? Is he still alive? Can I see him?
If I was Esau I have at least two questions on the tip of my tongue: Why did you do it – why did you rob me, why did you con me, not just once but twice? And: Why did you run away? Why didn't you have the guts to meet me face to face?
 
Being the reader of the narrative, looking at the Biblical personages from the outside I have even more questions: How did Isaac let this happen? How did Rebecca let this happen?
 
When Jacob and Esau meet, not one of these questions are asked. Not one of these questions are answered. The questions are real. In the Torah, when it says that they embraced, the word "And they kissed" is doted. This is very odd and rare. The Rabbis explain the reason for the dots is because we don't really know what each brother was truly feeling at that moment.  It is the greatest example in the Torah of: Don't Ask. Don't Tell. DADT.
 
In the Torah we never get these questions asked or answered because the Torah has a different focus. But in real life, hard, critical, core, existential questions can't be ignored and left unanswered. The questions always exist. The answers always exist. They are just hidden, even while active, just below the surface. Waiting. Waiting.
 
The idea of DADT has been active in all our lives in different and varying circumstances. There were times that I was very happy that my parents did not ask me what score I got on a test or homework assignment and I was surely not going to tell them of my own volition. In that case "silence was golden." But this example isn't really a good one, because it was about something external to me, a score on a test. It wasn't about me. That is very different.
 
Everyone here knows that "Don't Ask. Don't Tell" refers to the rule in the United States military that homosexual men and women can serve in the military if they keep their sexual identity hidden. The military won't ask so that these people won't have to tell. They do have to live a lie.
 
I have been following the Jewish conversation about this policy and the proposal to revoke it, namely to allow people who are LBGTQ to serve in the army and not have to lie about their sexuality. There have been many insightful comments that have prodded my thinking. I have also followed the conversation of those who do not want the policy changed and those who would dishonorably discharge all homosexual people serving in the military. A few thoughts:
 
1. For Judaism, the best quotation comes from the Muppets: People is people. A person is defined by the totality of the self, not one isolated component. Is there only one thing about me that defines me? Is it my age? Hair color? Sports inability? IQ? Religion? Why label a person by one trait/characterstic/component? Judaism would rather we look at the whole person.
 
2. Following that line of thought, in Judaism we don't call people by their transgression. There is no term in Judaism for 'homosexual.' At most you can refer to a passage in Leviticus that indicates that homosexual behavior is proscribed, not the individual. If you were in combat, what do you care about? I want someone who can shoot straight; who will have my back; that I can rely on. I would want a person, tried and true. What else counts?
 
3. Why can Israel make it work smoothly and the United States military fears that we can't? I will just leave that sit there.
 
4. Above the ark, the Aron HaKodesh, we have in symbolic relief the Ten Commandments. Number 9 states you should not be a lying witness against someone else. I believe that if I shouldn't lie about someone else, I shouldn't lie about myself.
 
5. In the same Ten Commandments, it includes robbery, murder, adultery, coveting as highest ranking sins. It doesn't list homosexual behavior. Who would you rather have in your building? Who would you rather have as second pilot or in the foxhole? Who would you not?
 
6. Labels are put on people usually to degrade them, disgrace them, and demean them. African-Americans, Catholics, Italians, Irish, and we, too, have had labels stuck on us, not for praise, but for ridicule and control. But times have changed. Nobody has called me a 'kike' in a long time. No one has looked for horns on my head. We have purged our language, my mother used to say that "she would wash my mouth out with soap," of words that demean, disgrace and degrade. Not because we are being PC but because we have a clearer picture of right and wrong; because we see all people being reflectors of God's holiness, because we take to heart the Rabbinic teaching that no person is higher, intrinsically or inherently better, than another. Our language shows what we think of "the other." We embody Hillel's dictum: "Love thy neighbor as thyself."
 
My list could extend much further, but I think that I have established sufficient foundation to say that from the perspective of Conservative Judaism, DADT should be repealed. Furthermore, I believe that Judaism would substantiate the position that men and women of the LBGTQ identification should be able to serve openly and honestly in the armed forces of the United States of America.
 
I want to close by referring to one of my greatest heroes. When I was as young as Mara, or maybe Kaleigh, I had many heroes, especially Roy Rogers and Dale Evens, Hopalong Cassidy, the Lone Ranger, and Gene Autry. These shows were morality plays. Every episode was about the struggle between good and bad, and they were the good guys – defending the weak, the widow, the disadvantaged, and the loner out on the prairie.  Here is Gene Autry's Cowboy Code.
 
1. The cowboy must never shoot first, hit a smaller man, or take unfair advantage.
 
2. He must never go back on his word, or a trust confided in him.
 
3. He must always tell the truth.
 
4. He must be gentle with children, the elderly and animals.
 
5. He must not advocate or possess racially or religiously intolerant ideas.
 
6. He must help people in distress.
 
7. He must be a good worker.
 
8. He must keep himself clean in thought, speech, action and personal habits.
 
9. He must respect women, parents, and his nation's laws.
 
10. The cowboy is a patriot.
 
Jacob and Esau lied. They lied to each other. They lied to themselves. They lied to their parents. In doing so they lied to their children. In Jacob's case the Torah relates how his children lied to him. "Don't Ask. Don't Tell" is a lie. It destroys everyone and saves no one. Maybe Gene Autry's Cowboy Code should be posted in every barracks. The Lone Ranger rides Silver. Roy Rogers rides Trigger. Hopalong Cassidy rides Topper. And Gene Autry rides Campion, sings "Back in the Saddle Again," and bequeaths us a very special code. I always wanted to be a cowboy.

Shabbat Shalom.


ynetnews.com: "Justice Elyakim Rubinstein says segregation of sexes on haredi bus lines will be deemed voluntary"



18:44 , 11.21.10

 
  Print

Human Rights
Photo: Ata AwisatMahadrin Bus lines: Men in front, women in rear Photo: Ata Awisat 
click here to enlarge text click here to enlarge text
Judge: Court to approve kosher buses
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3987731,00.html

Justice Elyakim Rubinstein says segregation of sexes on haredi bus lines will be deemed voluntary
Shahar Haselkorn

The High Court of Justice will not ban gender segregation on haredi bus routes, and is likely to accept the Transport Ministry's recommendation to make the separation between sexes voluntary rather than compulsory, Justice Elyakim Rubinstein said Sunday.

 

In line with the recommendation, Transportation Ministry officers will monitor buses serving the ultra-Orthodox population to make sure that no violence against female passengers takes place.

More Human Rights
US report: Religious coercion, violence in Israel rising  / Kobi Nahshoni
State Department's annual International Religious Freedom Report points to strict conversion policy, segregated bus lines, violent haredi protests in Jewish state
Full Story

 

It appears, however, that the High Court decision will not effectively overturn the current arrangement aboard the 'Kosher' bus lines, which forbids women from sitting in the front.

 

Sunday's hearing is expected to be the last to discuss the petition brought up against the Transportation Ministry and the Egged and Dan bus companies in 2007 by a group ofwomen in collaboration with the Israeli Religious Action Center.

 

The Transportation Ministry recommendation is based on a report presented by an official committee, which advised that well-monitored gender segregation is the best solution. Early in 2010, the High Court called for experimental implementation of the committee's conclusions for a period of one year.

 

An official High Court decision is expected to be published soon.

 

"Our tendency is to go with the conclusions that the Transportation Minister has adopted," Rubinstein said. "We are aware that there are reservations, but in our opinion the conclusions are balanced."

 

'Decision to validate current injustice'

Rubinstein's statement drew mixed reactions. Jerusalem City Council member Rachel Azaria told Ynet that the impending High Court decision will effectively validate the current segragation. She called the decision an attempt to have the cake and eat it, too. "On one hand, the court says the separation is illegal. On the other, it allows it to exist," she said.

 

Public transportation companies welcomed Rubinstein's statements. Attorney Orna Kadar, who represents the Egged bus company, said the decision provides a balanced solution to both sides of the dispute. "We must accept the Transportation Minister's announcement, and thus put an end to this petition," she said.

 

During the hearing, Attorney Orly Erez-Lachovsky, who represents some of the petitioners, warned against a partial implementation of the official committee's conclusions. "The report is all well and good, but it cannot remain a disregarded law," she said. "In our opinion, the court should declare that the report will be adopted verbatim."

 

Erez-Lachovsky addressed the the haredi bus line custom which requires the women to board through the rear doors. "Women who board through the rear doors have no courage to sit in the front," she said. "What the committee is saying is impossible, because if no change occurs on the surface, nothing will change. The women will have to obey."

 

According to Erez-Lachovsky, the solution is simple: Either close the rear door for boarding on haredi bus lines, or open them for boarding on all bus lines.

 

A recent Transportation Ministry investigation did not unearth any complaints on the special bus lines. The report produced by the monitoring company said that no incidents of coercion, aggression, yelling or the like were reported when in connection to the seating arrangement and the separation between men and women.

 

However, the company did say that on six out of 17 bus rides "the monitoring individuals were asked or required to move from their seats, which they did in order to avoid a confrontation with the local population."

 

Aviad Glickman contributed to this story

 

 




Back
 
 
---
Check out the new CNS Blogs:
// Shorashim Hebrew School //
// CNS Preschool //
// Edah //

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
Rabbis for Women of the Wall  ||  menachemcreditor.org 
To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Nov 19, 2010

Haaretz.com: "Nationalists are turning Zionism into a childish religion"

http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/opinion/nationalists-are-turning-zionism-into-a-childish-religion-1.325488

Nationalists are turning Zionism into a childish religion

Zionism has turned from a lofty, rational and pragmatic political program into a kind of religion - wizened, oppressively conservative and quite childish.

By Doron Rosenblum

The crowds of ministers and deputy ministers who surround Benjamin Netanyahu in their multitudes under the overall name "the government of Israel" sometimes seem like participants in a cantata or review: Every now and then, one of them gets up from among the semi-anonymous heads to make his voice heard - one with a trill in favor of annexation, another in a racist etude, yet another in an ethnocentric sermon, and another with a rational chirp. When one sits down, the next soloist gets up, while the Chorus of the Rock of our Existence follows him with background humming.

The soloist this week in the coalition's Cantata for Shwarma was the Minister of Culture, Limor Livnat, perhaps a mezzo-soprano or perhaps a Wagnerian Heldentenor; she was pushed aside and almost forgotten in recent years, maybe because of the dominant voices of the basses and tenors that were more thunderous and coarse than hers. The argument over Ariel has brought her back from the abyss of ministerial forgetfulness, and with her an ancient voice - "Zionism."

As a reaction to the artists' boycott of performances at Ariel, Livnat announced that she would grant a special prize "for encouraging Zionist creativity" - a declaration that suddenly puts on center stage not only Ariel and not only the half-forgotten Minister of Culture, but the very definition of Zionism itself, all of them somehow under the same umbrella, in a somewhat pathetic fashion.

At a time when the prime minister is forcing on us "Jewish" music and a repertoire of dirges and lamentations there is, on the face of it, something refreshing in recollecting the term "Zionism," which at least has something of the spirit of this place, even if it is nostalgic. When we hear mention of a "Zionist creation" our noses fill with the smell of manure, the fragrance of hay and youth movement songs. But could it be that when she thought about the prize, Livnat could hear the sound of songs of the underground movements and revolt as they were sung by her mother, Shulamit - as far as is known the only strong attachment the minister has to (a kind of ) "culture."

But we should not err: If there was some renewed success for the term "Zionism" in recent times, this was mainly in a negative and defiant sense, by automatically affixing the derogatory terms "anti-Zionist" or "post-Zionist" to anyone who does not go along with the agenda of defiance and annexations, the rituals of blind worship of the Israel Defense Forces or whatever else, or anyone who simply sins by aspiring to normalization and peace.

Indeed, if we examine what in actual fact this contemporary "Zionism" is, beyond its being in opposition to "post-Zionism," we find that it held up by two poles - inertia and nostalgia. Its substance is based on the sanctification of historical conventions, to the extent that they are agreed upon, whether we are referring to "settlement" or "military victory," and the insistence on continuing them blindly because of the momentum of their being what they are, without relating to the changes and consequences.

From this point of view, "Zionism," at least in its "neo" form, has turned from a lofty, rational and pragmatic political program that changes according to the political circumstances, into a kind of religion - wizened, oppressively conservative and quite childish. To paraphrase a witticism written once about modernism by my late friend Eli Mohar, it can be said that "post-Zionism" is today being faced by a kind of "putz-Zionism" that is pompous and full of itself, reinforced by archaic rituals of symbolism and opposed to anything other than that.

From this point of view, the nationalistic right in Israel is trying to do to "Zionism" what the ultra-Orthodox Jews and religious parties did to "Judaism" - to appropriate these terms for themselves and exclude others from them. But here lies the ironic trap. By this very act of parcellation, the side carrying out the appropriation remains with a property that has lost at least half its value and importance. Because the very fact that most of the Israeli public accepts this exclusion almost without protest, its tacit agreement to having these properties taken out of its hands will testify like a thousand witnesses to the fact that anyway many of the people are not interested in the way the terms are redesigned and redefined by those who have appropriated them.

In other words, if "Zionism" is [MKs] Tzipi Hotovely and Danny Danon and the Zo Artzeinu movement, and if a "Zionist creation" is supposed to be defined by Limor Livnat, then thank you very much, many people say. We will find ourselves a different definition, if we have not already done so a long time ago.


Check out the new CNS Blogs: Shorashim Hebrew School // CNS Preschool // Edah

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
Rabbis for Women of the Wall  ||  menachemcreditor.org 
To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

A Few of My Favorite Things

A Few of My Favorite Things
(c) Rabbi Menachem Creditor

My teacher, Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson, challenged some colleagues to make a list of what we consider to be the top ten or so issues confronting contemporary Jewish life.  They could be issues of modernity, moral dilemmas, political issues, issues of identity, ethnicity, faith, destiny, observance, education, or  history.  These are a few issues from my personal list. 
  • Multiple Authenticities in Jewish communal life
  • Commandedness/Compelling-ness in the Modern Jew's life
  • Intermarriage (meaning not "it completes Hitler's work!" but "is it the wrong thing to do?")
  • Davening as Opposed to Praying
  • A Holistic Zionism (both aspects of Herzl's dream: protecting and developing the Jewish State)
  • Jewish Youth Education: demanding inclusion and sustainability
  • "Jewish Establishment in the Cloud" - the paradigm shift from "headquarters" to technologically-enabled organizing, where "location" is irrelevant  
___


Check out the new CNS Blogs: Shorashim Hebrew School // CNS Preschool // Edah

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
Rabbis for Women of the Wall  ||  menachemcreditor.org 
To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.



On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:28 PM, Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson <bartson@ajula.edu> wrote:
Dear Hevrei,

I would like to ask a favor of each of you. Would you please take a few minutes during the next week or so to make a list of what you consider to be the top ten or so issues confronting contemporary Jewish life - these could be issues of modernity, moral dilemmas, political issues, issues of identity, ethnicity, faith, destiny, observance, education, history whatever.

If you would send me a list of your top 10 or so issues, I would be most grateful!

בברכת שלום

Brad
------

RABBI BRADLEY SHAVIT ARTSON
Abner and Roslyn Goldstine Dean's Chair
Vice President, American Jewish University 

Ziegler School of Rabbinic Studies 

Familian Campus
15600 Mulholland DR 
Los Angeles, CA 90077-1599
310 440 1257
































Check out the new CNS Blogs: Shorashim Hebrew School // CNS Preschool // Edah

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
Rabbis for Women of the Wall  ||  menachemcreditor.org 
To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Gamliel Institute - Chevra Kadisha class starts 1-11-11

The Gamliel Institute of Kavod v'Nichum is proud to announce that applications for admission and class registration are now being accepted for its second cohort of students. The twelve week class "Chevra Kadisha - The Holy Society", taught by Rabbi Stuart Kelman and David Zinner, begins January 11, 2011.

The Gamliel Institute educates and trains para-professionals and professionals to take leadership roles in creating a holistic "continuum of care" for their local Jewish community. The Institute's curricula covers life's spectrum of illness and comfort, death, funerals, burial and mourning. Based on over 2,000 years of texts and traditions, the program is a unique blend of Jewish communal obligation, care for the poor and elderly, consumer protection, Jewish continuity, and spiritual inspiration.

The Institute brings together diverse disciplines, including community organizing, consumer advocacy, bikkur cholim, chaplaincy and rabbinics, thanatology, hospice care, grief therapy, funeral direction, cemetery management, and legacy planning and preparation. Classes are held in an environment that acknowledges the contributions of all the streams of Judaism, from Renewal to Chabad, and incorporates them into a unique, comprehensive training program.

The Institute offers both a certificate program and individual courses including Chevra Kadisha - The Holy Society; Tahara and Shmira (ritual washing and guarding); Strategies for Communal Education and Training; Funeral Homes and Cemeteries; Nechama (comfort); and Traditional Jewish Practices around Death. 

For more information, please visit our
web site at www.Jewish-funerals.org and click on the Gamliel Institute link.


Check out the new CNS Blogs: Shorashim Hebrew School // CNS Preschool // Edah

---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
Rabbis for Women of the Wall  ||  menachemcreditor.org 
To join Rabbi Creditor's email list, send a blank email to thetisch-subscribe@yahoogroups.com.

Nov 18, 2010

Synagogue 3000 -- "doing jewish stuff" - an experiment called NITA


Having trouble viewing this email? Click here
new s3k logo

"doing jewish stuff" - an experiment called NITA

 

"Gen X's less than enthusiastic response to synagogue life simply points to the fact that a new generation needs to figure out how do Jewish on its own terms, in its own way."    Rabbi Noa Kushner

Dear friends, s3kreport

 

Synagogue 3000's Synagogue Studies Institute is proud to release its report,

"doing jewish stuff" - an experiment called NITA by Rabbi Noa Kushner.

Rabbi Kushner is the founding rabbi of Nita, (www.nitamarin.org) a project of Congregation Rodef Sholom in the San Francisco Bay area.

 

Nita (Hebrew for, "We will plant, we will grow") is an experiment in "doing Jewish" differently. As one of Synagogue 3000's Next Dor pilots, Nita has spent the last year plus creating a new model of community led by Kushner who describes her rabbinate as "... one part sales, one part emunah (faith), and one part chutzpah - a stubborn refusal to give up on my generation of Jews."

 

In this S3K report, Kushner reflects on the creation of Nita and its development over the last year. If we do Jewish differently, what does it mean to be a member? How do new communities pay their way? What's in store for the future?

 

Download the report here, and join the conversation on Synablog

Thank you,
 
The S3K Team

Synagogue 3000 | One West 4th Street | New York | NY | 10012

Total Pageviews