Shabbat Shalom.
Nov 21, 2010
Rabbi Gary S. Creditor: "Jacob and Esau: Don’t Ask. Don’t Tell."
Shabbat Shalom.
ynetnews.com: "Justice Elyakim Rubinstein says segregation of sexes on haredi bus lines will be deemed voluntary"
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| | Judge: Court to approve kosher buses http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3987731,00.html Justice Elyakim Rubinstein says segregation of sexes on haredi bus lines will be deemed voluntary Shahar Haselkorn The High Court of Justice will not ban gender segregation on haredi bus routes, and is likely to accept the Transport Ministry's recommendation to make the separation between sexes voluntary rather than compulsory, Justice Elyakim Rubinstein said Sunday.
In line with the recommendation, Transportation Ministry officers will monitor buses serving the ultra-Orthodox population to make sure that no violence against female passengers takes place.
It appears, however, that the High Court decision will not effectively overturn the current arrangement aboard the 'Kosher' bus lines, which forbids women from sitting in the front.
Sunday's hearing is expected to be the last to discuss the petition brought up against the Transportation Ministry and the Egged and Dan bus companies in 2007 by a group ofwomen in collaboration with the Israeli Religious Action Center.
The Transportation Ministry recommendation is based on a report presented by an official committee, which advised that well-monitored gender segregation is the best solution. Early in 2010, the High Court called for experimental implementation of the committee's conclusions for a period of one year.
An official High Court decision is expected to be published soon.
"Our tendency is to go with the conclusions that the Transportation Minister has adopted," Rubinstein said. "We are aware that there are reservations, but in our opinion the conclusions are balanced."
'Decision to validate current injustice'Rubinstein's statement drew mixed reactions. Jerusalem City Council member Rachel Azaria told Ynet that the impending High Court decision will effectively validate the current segragation. She called the decision an attempt to have the cake and eat it, too. "On one hand, the court says the separation is illegal. On the other, it allows it to exist," she said.
Public transportation companies welcomed Rubinstein's statements. Attorney Orna Kadar, who represents the Egged bus company, said the decision provides a balanced solution to both sides of the dispute. "We must accept the Transportation Minister's announcement, and thus put an end to this petition," she said.
During the hearing, Attorney Orly Erez-Lachovsky, who represents some of the petitioners, warned against a partial implementation of the official committee's conclusions. "The report is all well and good, but it cannot remain a disregarded law," she said. "In our opinion, the court should declare that the report will be adopted verbatim."
Erez-Lachovsky addressed the the haredi bus line custom which requires the women to board through the rear doors. "Women who board through the rear doors have no courage to sit in the front," she said. "What the committee is saying is impossible, because if no change occurs on the surface, nothing will change. The women will have to obey."
According to Erez-Lachovsky, the solution is simple: Either close the rear door for boarding on haredi bus lines, or open them for boarding on all bus lines.
A recent Transportation Ministry investigation did not unearth any complaints on the special bus lines. The report produced by the monitoring company said that no incidents of coercion, aggression, yelling or the like were reported when in connection to the seating arrangement and the separation between men and women.
However, the company did say that on six out of 17 bus rides "the monitoring individuals were asked or required to move from their seats, which they did in order to avoid a confrontation with the local population."
Aviad Glickman contributed to this story
Back | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
Nov 19, 2010
Haaretz.com: "Nationalists are turning Zionism into a childish religion"
Nationalists are turning Zionism into a childish religion
Zionism has turned from a lofty, rational and pragmatic political program into a kind of religion - wizened, oppressively conservative and quite childish.
By Doron RosenblumThe crowds of ministers and deputy ministers who surround Benjamin Netanyahu in their multitudes under the overall name "the government of Israel" sometimes seem like participants in a cantata or review: Every now and then, one of them gets up from among the semi-anonymous heads to make his voice heard - one with a trill in favor of annexation, another in a racist etude, yet another in an ethnocentric sermon, and another with a rational chirp. When one sits down, the next soloist gets up, while the Chorus of the Rock of our Existence follows him with background humming.
The soloist this week in the coalition's Cantata for Shwarma was the Minister of Culture, Limor Livnat, perhaps a mezzo-soprano or perhaps a Wagnerian Heldentenor; she was pushed aside and almost forgotten in recent years, maybe because of the dominant voices of the basses and tenors that were more thunderous and coarse than hers. The argument over Ariel has brought her back from the abyss of ministerial forgetfulness, and with her an ancient voice - "Zionism."
As a reaction to the artists' boycott of performances at Ariel, Livnat announced that she would grant a special prize "for encouraging Zionist creativity" - a declaration that suddenly puts on center stage not only Ariel and not only the half-forgotten Minister of Culture, but the very definition of Zionism itself, all of them somehow under the same umbrella, in a somewhat pathetic fashion.
At a time when the prime minister is forcing on us "Jewish" music and a repertoire of dirges and lamentations there is, on the face of it, something refreshing in recollecting the term "Zionism," which at least has something of the spirit of this place, even if it is nostalgic. When we hear mention of a "Zionist creation" our noses fill with the smell of manure, the fragrance of hay and youth movement songs. But could it be that when she thought about the prize, Livnat could hear the sound of songs of the underground movements and revolt as they were sung by her mother, Shulamit - as far as is known the only strong attachment the minister has to (a kind of ) "culture."
But we should not err: If there was some renewed success for the term "Zionism" in recent times, this was mainly in a negative and defiant sense, by automatically affixing the derogatory terms "anti-Zionist" or "post-Zionist" to anyone who does not go along with the agenda of defiance and annexations, the rituals of blind worship of the Israel Defense Forces or whatever else, or anyone who simply sins by aspiring to normalization and peace.
Indeed, if we examine what in actual fact this contemporary "Zionism" is, beyond its being in opposition to "post-Zionism," we find that it held up by two poles - inertia and nostalgia. Its substance is based on the sanctification of historical conventions, to the extent that they are agreed upon, whether we are referring to "settlement" or "military victory," and the insistence on continuing them blindly because of the momentum of their being what they are, without relating to the changes and consequences.
From this point of view, "Zionism," at least in its "neo" form, has turned from a lofty, rational and pragmatic political program that changes according to the political circumstances, into a kind of religion - wizened, oppressively conservative and quite childish. To paraphrase a witticism written once about modernism by my late friend Eli Mohar, it can be said that "post-Zionism" is today being faced by a kind of "putz-Zionism" that is pompous and full of itself, reinforced by archaic rituals of symbolism and opposed to anything other than that.
From this point of view, the nationalistic right in Israel is trying to do to "Zionism" what the ultra-Orthodox Jews and religious parties did to "Judaism" - to appropriate these terms for themselves and exclude others from them. But here lies the ironic trap. By this very act of parcellation, the side carrying out the appropriation remains with a property that has lost at least half its value and importance. Because the very fact that most of the Israeli public accepts this exclusion almost without protest, its tacit agreement to having these properties taken out of its hands will testify like a thousand witnesses to the fact that anyway many of the people are not interested in the way the terms are redesigned and redefined by those who have appropriated them.
In other words, if "Zionism" is [MKs] Tzipi Hotovely and Danny Danon and the Zo Artzeinu movement, and if a "Zionist creation" is supposed to be defined by Limor Livnat, then thank you very much, many people say. We will find ourselves a different definition, if we have not already done so a long time ago.
---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
A Few of My Favorite Things
(c) Rabbi Menachem Creditor
My teacher, Rabbi Bradley Shavit Artson, challenged some colleagues to make a list of what we consider to be the top ten or so issues confronting contemporary Jewish life. They could be issues of modernity, moral dilemmas, political issues, issues of identity, ethnicity, faith, destiny, observance, education, or history. These are a few issues from my personal list.
- Multiple Authenticities in Jewish communal life
- Commandedness/Compelling-ness in the Modern Jew's life
- Intermarriage (meaning not "it completes Hitler's work!" but "is it the wrong thing to do?")
- Davening as Opposed to Praying
- A Holistic Zionism (both aspects of Herzl's dream: protecting and developing the Jewish State)
- Jewish Youth Education: demanding inclusion and sustainability
- "Jewish Establishment in the Cloud" - the paradigm shift from "headquarters" to technologically-enabled organizing, where "location" is irrelevant
---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
Dear Hevrei,I would like to ask a favor of each of you. Would you please take a few minutes during the next week or so to make a list of what you consider to be the top ten or so issues confronting contemporary Jewish life - these could be issues of modernity, moral dilemmas, political issues, issues of identity, ethnicity, faith, destiny, observance, education, history whatever.If you would send me a list of your top 10 or so issues, I would be most grateful!בברכת שלוםBrad------RABBI BRADLEY SHAVIT ARTSONAbner and Roslyn Goldstine Dean's ChairVice President, American Jewish UniversityZiegler School of Rabbinic StudiesFamilian Campus15600 Mulholland DRLos Angeles, CA 90077-1599310 440 1257
---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
Gamliel Institute - Chevra Kadisha class starts 1-11-11
The Gamliel Institute of Kavod v'Nichum is proud to announce that applications for admission and class registration are now being accepted for its second cohort of students. The twelve week class "Chevra Kadisha - The Holy Society", taught by Rabbi Stuart Kelman and David Zinner, begins January 11, 2011.
The Gamliel Institute educates and trains para-professionals and professionals to take leadership roles in creating a holistic "continuum of care" for their local Jewish community. The Institute's curricula covers life's spectrum of illness and comfort, death, funerals, burial and mourning. Based on over 2,000 years of texts and traditions, the program is a unique blend of Jewish communal obligation, care for the poor and elderly, consumer protection, Jewish continuity, and spiritual inspiration.
The Institute brings together diverse disciplines, including community organizing, consumer advocacy, bikkur cholim, chaplaincy and rabbinics, thanatology, hospice care, grief therapy, funeral direction, cemetery management, and legacy planning and preparation. Classes are held in an environment that acknowledges the contributions of all the streams of Judaism, from Renewal to Chabad, and incorporates them into a unique, comprehensive training program.
The Institute offers both a certificate program and individual courses including Chevra Kadisha - The Holy Society; Tahara and Shmira (ritual washing and guarding); Strategies for Communal Education and Training; Funeral Homes and Cemeteries; Nechama (comfort); and Traditional Jewish Practices around Death.For more information, please visit our web site at www.Jewish-funerals.org and click on the Gamliel Institute link.
---
Rabbi Menachem Creditor
Nov 18, 2010
Synagogue 3000 -- "doing jewish stuff" - an experiment called NITA
| Having trouble viewing this email? Click here |
| |||||||||||
Synagogue 3000 | One West 4th Street | New York | NY | 10012 |
Total Pageviews
-
“The responsible life is a life that responds. The Hebrew for responsibility, achrayut, comes from the word acher, meaning “other.” Our gr...
-
An Open Letter to the Leadership of the Toronto International Film Festival (TIFF) Rabbi Menachem Creditor Your decision to cancel the scre...
-
A new Bigger on the Inside post: #Hook - "There You Are" "There you are, Peter!" Over time, our eyes can become dim. ...